Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:25983 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 39538 invoked by uid 1010); 6 Oct 2006 23:25:49 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 39522 invoked from network); 6 Oct 2006 23:25:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 6 Oct 2006 23:25:49 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=rasmus@lerdorf.com; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=rasmus@lerdorf.com; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain lerdorf.com from 204.11.219.139 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: rasmus@lerdorf.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 204.11.219.139 lerdorf.com Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from [204.11.219.139] ([204.11.219.139:46137] helo=lerdorf.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 52/5C-62831-BF5E6254 for ; Fri, 06 Oct 2006 19:25:48 -0400 Received: from [207.126.233.18] (rasmus2.corp.yahoo.com [207.126.233.18]) (authenticated bits=0) by lerdorf.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-2) with ESMTP id k96NPgno008005; Fri, 6 Oct 2006 16:25:42 -0700 Message-ID: <4526E5F6.7040506@lerdorf.com> Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2006 16:25:42 -0700 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Macintosh/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Edin Kadribasic CC: Ilia Alshanetsky , PHP Internals List References: <4526E304.50701@emini.dk> In-Reply-To: <4526E304.50701@emini.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Release php-5.2.0RC6 From: rasmus@lerdorf.com (Rasmus Lerdorf) Edin Kadribasic wrote: > Now that we know that there is going to be RC6 I think there is no point > in waiting for another week for it just because we have to release > things on Thursday. > > I think that the best thing would be to make immediate RC6 and allow > people some time to test it, and if nothing critical comes up, release > the final version in a week or so. Many people haven't had a chance to look at RC5 yet. I think cycling through them too fast is going to frustrate people. Give them a couple of days to report other issues before going to RC6. -Rasmus