Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:25970 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 74219 invoked by uid 1010); 6 Oct 2006 16:58:21 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 74196 invoked from network); 6 Oct 2006 16:58:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 6 Oct 2006 16:58:20 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=derick@php.net; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=derick@php.net; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net from 82.94.239.5 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: derick@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 82.94.239.5 jdi.jdi-ict.nl Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from [82.94.239.5] ([82.94.239.5:33570] helo=jdi.jdi-ict.nl) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id E4/1B-11652-B2B86254 for ; Fri, 06 Oct 2006 12:58:20 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jdi.jdi-ict.nl (8.13.7/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k96GwFiP023069; Fri, 6 Oct 2006 18:58:16 +0200 Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 18:57:50 +0200 (CEST) X-X-Sender: derick@localhost To: Edin Kadribasic cc: internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: <45267D5A.70401@emini.dk> Message-ID: References: <50.8B.48579.ED205254@pb1.pair.com> <45252FC7.9030500@php.net> <4e89b4260610060728v51b1ba65m69304a88d693ce7d@mail.gmail.com> <45267188.9030107@emini.dk> <45267B7D.9080206@zend.com> <45267C07.3090404@emini.dk> <45267D5A.70401@emini.dk> X-Face: "L'&?Ah3MYF@FB4hU'XhNhLB]222(Lbr2Y@F:GE[OO;"F5p>qtFBl|yVVA&D{A(g3[C}mG:199P+5C'v.M/u@Z\![0b:Mv.[l6[uWl' MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [VOTE] Intermediate Results From: derick@php.net (Derick Rethans) On Fri, 6 Oct 2006, Edin Kadribasic wrote: > Edin Kadribasic wrote: > > Stanislav Malyshev wrote: > > > > The vote is should OO strictness (fatal error on changing function > > > > arguments in derived classes in this case) be removed or kept. > > > > > > I think fatal error should be definitely removed or the rules be at least > > > relaxed sufficiently to accomodate for PHP flexibility - e.g., () should > > > be allowed to be overriden with ($a, $b, $c), etc. In light of technical > > > difficulty to implement sufficiently flexible cheks, I would not mind > > > removing them altogether or demoting them to very low priority notice. > > > > Yes, it was my opinion as well that E_NOTICE would be the most appropriate > > choice here. > > Hate to have to reply to myself, but to clarify. > > I believe that most OO "strictness" fatal errors should be demoted to notices. This is why we have E_STRICT, not? :) regards, Derick