Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:25969 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 71973 invoked by uid 1010); 6 Oct 2006 16:57:12 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 71957 invoked from network); 6 Oct 2006 16:57:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 6 Oct 2006 16:57:12 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=derick@php.net; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=derick@php.net; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net from 82.94.239.5 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: derick@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 82.94.239.5 jdi.jdi-ict.nl Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from [82.94.239.5] ([82.94.239.5:36964] helo=jdi.jdi-ict.nl) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 28/AA-11652-6EA86254 for ; Fri, 06 Oct 2006 12:57:12 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jdi.jdi-ict.nl (8.13.7/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k96Gv7cP012705; Fri, 6 Oct 2006 18:57:07 +0200 Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 18:56:41 +0200 (CEST) X-X-Sender: derick@localhost To: Michael Wallner cc: internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: <50.8B.48579.ED205254@pb1.pair.com> Message-ID: References: <50.8B.48579.ED205254@pb1.pair.com> X-Face: "L'&?Ah3MYF@FB4hU'XhNhLB]222(Lbr2Y@F:GE[OO;"F5p>qtFBl|yVVA&D{A(g3[C}mG:199P+5C'v.M/u@Z\![0b:Mv.[l6[uWl' MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [VOTE] Intermediate Results From: derick@php.net (Derick Rethans) On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, Michael Wallner wrote: > Michael Wallner wrote: > > > I'd therefore like to conduct a serious vote on this issue. > > > > [X] (+1) please remove that redundant strictness again > > [ ] (-1) leave as it is, we need strict OO implementation > > [ ] ( 0) what the hell are you talking about? > > > 3, 2 [+1] (remove) Mike, Pierre, Edin (Robert Cummings, Bertrand Gugger) > 1, 1 [+0] (nonfatal) Zeev (Richard Lynch) > 3, 0 [-1] (leave) Sebastian, Ilia, Derick > > > There are lots of people still missing. I would rather see that it stays e_error, but a demotion to e_strict would work for me as well. But then we should also be able to instate the e_strict for other strictness issues with the OO model (such as using an undeclared class variable). regards, Derick