Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:25899
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 80.74.107.235 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <451D8BCC.1010507@zend.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 14:10:36 -0700
Organization: Zend Technologies
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Sara Golemon <pollita@php.net>
CC:  internals@lists.php.net
References: <03a49eb85c1b86038c5d127230bd3f78@gravitonic.com>    <a68c7bb1b4a752d874bcdb7161d9f69c@gravitonic.com> <61923.208.195.234.254.1159463675.squirrel@www.l-i-e.com> <5F.60.15221.DAC6D154@pb1.pair.com>
In-Reply-To: <5F.60.15221.DAC6D154@pb1.pair.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Per-request UG(unicode)
From: stas@zend.com (Stanislav Malyshev)


> Nooone is arguing that from the userspace side, having per-dir support for 
> setting the unicode flag is a good thing.  It is.  The question is:  Is it 
> good enough to justify the soup that will become of the internal registries?

I'm not sure there really would be a soup. Yes, there would be two 
copies of persistent system hashes - namely, class table and function 
table - and probably there would be a need to deal with other persistent 
  tables like module lists in couple of places - but besides that there 
should be not much of a soup...