Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:25897 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 88758 invoked by uid 1010); 29 Sep 2006 18:57:50 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 88743 invoked from network); 29 Sep 2006 18:57:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 29 Sep 2006 18:57:49 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 207.126.230.225 nat-dip4.corp.yahoo.com Received: from [207.126.230.225] ([207.126.230.225:3763] helo=localhost.localdomain) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 5F/60-15221-DAC6D154 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 14:57:49 -0400 Message-ID: <5F.60.15221.DAC6D154@pb1.pair.com> To: internals@lists.php.net References: <03a49eb85c1b86038c5d127230bd3f78@gravitonic.com> <61923.208.195.234.254.1159463675.squirrel@www.l-i-e.com> Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 11:41:43 -0700 Lines: 18 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original X-Posted-By: 207.126.230.225 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Per-request UG(unicode) From: pollita@php.net ("Sara Golemon") >> No comments? > > I'm definitely +1 on the per-host configure option, if it's stable > enough to satisfy QA team. > > Making migration to unicode apps easier is definitely a big win for > adoption. > Nooone is arguing that from the userspace side, having per-dir support for setting the unicode flag is a good thing. It is. The question is: Is it good enough to justify the soup that will become of the internal registries? atm, I don't think it is... -1 -Sara