Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:25895 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 71329 invoked by uid 1010); 29 Sep 2006 13:42:18 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 71314 invoked from network); 29 Sep 2006 13:42:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 29 Sep 2006 13:42:18 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=antony@zend.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=antony@zend.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 80.74.107.235 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: antony@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 80.74.107.235 mail.zend.com Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from [80.74.107.235] ([80.74.107.235:38791] helo=mail.zend.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 33/69-06827-7B22D154 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 09:42:17 -0400 Received: (qmail 669 invoked from network); 29 Sep 2006 13:40:56 -0000 Received: from internal.zend.office (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (10.1.1.1) by internal.zend.office with SMTP; 29 Sep 2006 13:40:56 -0000 Message-ID: <451D2278.8040407@zend.com> Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 17:41:12 +0400 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ilia Alshanetsky CC: PHPdev Mailing List References: <9D21C7F4-5269-47C2-B574-F563B378A4CF@prohost.org> <451CE201.7030607@zend.com> <04EA2E4C-7681-4DA8-AB1D-B7E68D3E8313@prohost.org> In-Reply-To: <04EA2E4C-7681-4DA8-AB1D-B7E68D3E8313@prohost.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Filter Vote From: antony@zend.com (Antony Dovgal) On 29.09.2006 17:37, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote: > On 29-Sep-06, at 5:06 AM, Antony Dovgal wrote: > >> On 29.09.2006 03:52, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote: >>> A good deal of time has passed and it seems Derick and Pierre are >>> no closer to the consensus about the filter extension and in the >>> meantime 5.2 release process is stalling. At this point I think >>> as the Release Manager I need make a decision on how to proceed. >>> Before I make a decision I'd like to hear some feedback from >>> other developers and users of PHP on what they think. >>> The current options are: >> >> I would like to see one more RC released. >> And I think a _total_ freeze after this RC would make a lot of >> sense, since we keep changing the code in every RC.. > > There will definitely be an RC5, quantity of changes made since RC4 > warrants it, but after this RC I'd like to "close the tree" so we > need to resolve the filter issue now. Perfect. In this case I'd give my vote for: --- [x] Go with what we have right now, and if filter developers want to make changes they'll need to do so in a manner backwards compatible to the current code. --- -- Wbr, Antony Dovgal