Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:25832 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 57710 invoked by uid 1010); 26 Sep 2006 07:58:56 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 57694 invoked from network); 26 Sep 2006 07:58:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 26 Sep 2006 07:58:56 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=lsmith@php.net; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=lsmith@php.net; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net from 212.112.227.169 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: lsmith@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.112.227.169 ipx11223.ipxserver.de Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from [212.112.227.169] ([212.112.227.169:34161] helo=ipx11223.ipxserver.de) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 07/70-54386-FBDD8154 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 03:58:56 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ipx11223.ipxserver.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D3B4DF0075; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 09:58:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ipx11223.ipxserver.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (flottensignalgeber [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 16065-07; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 09:58:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (i577B56CC.versanet.de [87.123.86.204]) by ipx11223.ipxserver.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DAA5DF0004; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 09:58:52 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4518DDBE.2060806@php.net> Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 09:58:54 +0200 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Derick Rethans Cc: Ron Korving , internals@lists.php.net References: <7.0.1.0.2.20060924133501.05254570@zend.com> <47.D2.14982.92F96154@pb1.pair.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by somedaemon at backendmedia.com Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] (was: Parameter checking in 5.2) From: lsmith@php.net (Lukas Kahwe Smith) Derick Rethans wrote: > On Sun, 24 Sep 2006, Ron Korving wrote: > >> In this case, wouldn't E_NOTICE make more sense? E_STRICT kind of indicates >> that certain behaviour is deprecated, right? > > Not really, E_STRICT is for when you're doing something that you > shouldn't. In my opinion that includes using a deprecated function but > adding a new level "E_DEPRECATED" is fine with me as well. I think its really about time we make this split. In that case I would be ok with making signature changes an E_STRICT. Otherwise I would rather see them removed. regards, Lukas