Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:25824 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 80331 invoked by uid 1010); 25 Sep 2006 17:30:13 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 80316 invoked from network); 25 Sep 2006 17:30:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 25 Sep 2006 17:30:13 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=derick@php.net; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=derick@php.net; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net from 82.94.239.5 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: derick@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 82.94.239.5 jdi.jdi-ict.nl Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from [82.94.239.5] ([82.94.239.5:58767] helo=jdi.jdi-ict.nl) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 02/0D-24622-22218154 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 13:30:10 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jdi.jdi-ict.nl (8.13.7/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k8PHU6ee025617; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 19:30:06 +0200 Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 19:29:48 +0200 (CEST) X-X-Sender: derick@localhost To: Ron Korving cc: internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: <47.D2.14982.92F96154@pb1.pair.com> Message-ID: References: <7.0.1.0.2.20060924133501.05254570@zend.com> <47.D2.14982.92F96154@pb1.pair.com> X-Face: "L'&?Ah3MYF@FB4hU'XhNhLB]222(Lbr2Y@F:GE[OO;"F5p>qtFBl|yVVA&D{A(g3[C}mG:199P+5C'v.M/u@Z\![0b:Mv.[l6[uWl' MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] (was: Parameter checking in 5.2) From: derick@php.net (Derick Rethans) On Sun, 24 Sep 2006, Ron Korving wrote: > In this case, wouldn't E_NOTICE make more sense? E_STRICT kind of indicates > that certain behaviour is deprecated, right? Not really, E_STRICT is for when you're doing something that you shouldn't. In my opinion that includes using a deprecated function but adding a new level "E_DEPRECATED" is fine with me as well. Derick -- Derick Rethans http://derickrethans.nl | http://ez.no | http://xdebug.org