Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:25698 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 26593 invoked by uid 1010); 14 Sep 2006 18:30:37 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 26578 invoked from network); 14 Sep 2006 18:30:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 14 Sep 2006 18:30:37 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=good Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 64.233.182.190 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: good X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 64.233.182.190 nf-out-0910.google.com Linux 2.4/2.6 Received: from [64.233.182.190] ([64.233.182.190:25728] helo=nf-out-0910.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 86/67-45066-AAF99054 for ; Thu, 14 Sep 2006 14:30:37 -0400 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id l24so2164678nfc for ; Thu, 14 Sep 2006 11:30:00 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=YmgDh1rJRo504CQPYHvCob4pd6x5mWuBkAKtdlAio03Fc00+Sa1ShAHigz4pAnSU2ajYaNdWaNBfczw6NoiG5wLsYKGHVbCpOpNXEbuNCOKaW8wXa2+WX1qhje6nUEag9nj0oM67+acBylra5mSR/9Ts9Zu44jQZXpW32j1iszs= Received: by 10.78.201.10 with SMTP id y10mr1045934huf; Thu, 14 Sep 2006 11:30:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.137.6 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Sep 2006 11:30:00 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 20:30:00 +0200 To: "Steph Fox" Cc: internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: <069a01c6d82a$8f198c00$6602a8c0@foxbox> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060914104410.09bdd7f6.mba2000@ioplex.com> <20060914131414.0cef91b2.mba2000@ioplex.com> <064c01c6d822$d37bc730$6602a8c0@foxbox> <066201c6d827$c7cad200$6602a8c0@foxbox> <069a01c6d82a$8f198c00$6602a8c0@foxbox> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Module API Changes From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre) Hello, On 9/14/06, Steph Fox wrote: > Huh? > > The question was about module API change, which is transparent to anyone > mixing and matching PHP and module versions (which incidentally they > shouldn't be doing in the first place). The extension API doesn't matter to > anyone but extension authors... Which are the target audience for this text, maybe I was not clear :) > README.EXTENSIONS than in an upgrade file aimed at end users, where it just > looks scary and oblique. > > OK so I'll update that file tomorrow and reference it from the upgrade file. > Any objections to that approach? As long as there is a notice in the 5.2 ugprade me, I'm fine with that. Something like "internal API changed, see...". Thanks :) --Pierre