Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:25594 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 92641 invoked by uid 1010); 10 Sep 2006 17:19:37 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 92625 invoked from network); 10 Sep 2006 17:19:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 10 Sep 2006 17:19:37 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=derick@php.net; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=derick@php.net; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net from 82.94.239.5 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: derick@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 82.94.239.5 jdi.jdi-ict.nl Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from [82.94.239.5] ([82.94.239.5:55582] helo=jdi.jdi-ict.nl) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 37/26-46429-82944054 for ; Sun, 10 Sep 2006 13:19:36 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jdi.jdi-ict.nl (8.13.7/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k8AHJWNd017318; Sun, 10 Sep 2006 19:19:32 +0200 Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 19:18:30 +0200 (CEST) X-X-Sender: derick@localhost To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Terje_Sletteb=F8?= cc: Pierre , PHP Developers Mailing List In-Reply-To: <002201c6d4fa$68766560$9a02a8c0@pc> Message-ID: References: <015801c6d4d5$6440d1d0$9a02a8c0@pc> <7f3ed2c30609100744x7a5d4fdfs9601ae4671b351d3@mail.gmail.com> <003401c6d4ee$1b251d80$9a02a8c0@pc> <1803358544.20060910173549@marcus-boerger.de> <002301c6d4f6$1c4ba280$9a02a8c0@pc> <002201c6d4fa$68766560$9a02a8c0@pc> X-Face: "L'&?Ah3MYF@FB4hU'XhNhLB]222(Lbr2Y@F:GE[OO;"F5p>qtFBl|yVVA&D{A(g3[C}mG:199P+5C'v.M/u@Z\![0b:Mv.[l6[uWl' MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="8323328-832002147-1157908682=:11240" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Multi-paradigm design (was: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: __autoloading and functions) From: derick@php.net (Derick Rethans) --8323328-832002147-1157908682=:11240 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE On Sun, 10 Sep 2006, Terje Sletteb=F8 wrote: > > > P.S: As an aside: Why is everybody (?) replying to both the list=20 > > > _and_ the poster? If you post, isn't it safe to assume you're=20 > > > actually on the list, or am I missing something? > > > > It is a common usage here. Some uses nntp, other mails (and filters, > etc..). >=20 > Ok. It's just that it's very unusual for mailing lists (at least the=20 > ones I have experience with), but whatever. The following URL explains why it is a bad idea to mangle the reply-to=20 header (like some other lists do): http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html > > It is also nice to do not start a new thread for no obvious reason but > > having another topic, it makes a mess out of the archives and is > > harder to follow. >=20 > I'm afraid I didn't understand your point. When you say "start a thread",= do > you mean changing the subject line (as I did)? It's my understanding that > people in general prefer that you change the subject line, if the topic > changes, as it otherwise makes it much harder to follow the discussion... > (and you may have to wade through a lot of postings having nothing to do > with the subject line, or miss an interesting discussion, for the same > reason). Yup, but you should use "New Mail" and not "Reply-To" in that case as=20 now the new mail appears in the same thread as the old subject. regards, Derick --=20 Derick Rethans http://derickrethans.nl | http://ez.no | http://xdebug.org --8323328-832002147-1157908682=:11240--