Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:25552 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 43966 invoked by uid 1010); 6 Sep 2006 19:24:19 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 43951 invoked from network); 6 Sep 2006 19:24:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 6 Sep 2006 19:24:19 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=cschneid@cschneid.com; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=cschneid@cschneid.com; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain cschneid.com from 195.141.85.117 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: cschneid@cschneid.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 195.141.85.117 uf1.search.ch Linux 2.4/2.6 Received: from [195.141.85.117] ([195.141.85.117:57643] helo=verksam.search.ch) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id D0/93-10926-0602FF44 for ; Wed, 06 Sep 2006 15:24:18 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by verksam.search.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id D75353A04E1; Wed, 6 Sep 2006 21:24:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from unknown by localhost (amavisd-new, unix socket) id client-XXWL6MUQ; Wed, 6 Sep 2006 21:24:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: by verksam.search.ch (Postfix, from userid 65534) id E1F473A04F9; Wed, 6 Sep 2006 21:24:07 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on verksam.search.ch X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 Received: from [192.168.1.72] (ultrafilter-i [192.168.85.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by verksam.search.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 010C03A04E1; Wed, 6 Sep 2006 21:24:06 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <44FF2055.6080500@cschneid.com> Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2006 21:24:05 +0200 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060725) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: RQuadling@GoogleMail.com Cc: PHP Internals References: <2b9a524b62303d2b7c3f5e20a7b86537@gravitonic.com> <44FF1336.1070007@php.net> <10845a340609061158m49545e5cg63f19bd40cea7c1e@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <10845a340609061158m49545e5cg63f19bd40cea7c1e@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at search.ch Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC: unicode.semantics: runtime or not? From: cschneid@cschneid.com (Christian Schneider) Richard Quadling wrote: > I agree on this. From my reading of some the issues around unicode you are > far better off simply saying PHP6 is unicode only. A lot of scripts that You didn't address the point of people who don't need Unicode but need the fast possible version (because slower running time = more servers needed = more money spent). Now whether you say "screw them, they should stick to PHP5" is up to the core team, that's for sure :-) - Chris