Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:25380
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
DomainKey-Status: good
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=Hz4vyoqt8xFyophNas0YP/8/kUF8ALR7kyd1qIs/OIjKqE66ZKeRnz838/olfFHvAosi8UmpNGMLrMtquHW08I5fennvT/wDyxrTxEfpyz4tm6f2PgxvFxl3PE7MC+kXp8qiUkJLKD8y5kEBhC4pHJMeOacNRirEQEAC4KWwKaY=
Message-ID: <fe05d1540608160706m74accf56v1db81138a547f68@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 16:06:40 +0200
To: "Ilia Alshanetsky" <ilia@prohost.org>
Cc: internals@lists.php.net
In-Reply-To: <577410F7-DB94-40E3-B524-62014FCD5935@prohost.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <20060816123006.4028b334@pierre-u64>
	 <577410F7-DB94-40E3-B524-62014FCD5935@prohost.org>
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] increase the default memory limit in 5.2.0+
From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre)

Hello,

On 8/16/06, Ilia Alshanetsky <ilia@prohost.org> wrote:
> On 16-Aug-06, at 6:30 AM, Pierre wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > After having tested 5.2 and the new memory manager for a couple of
> > weeks, I notice a significant increase of the reported memory
> > usage. As
> > a side effect, many applications reach the 8M memory limit. It can be
> > a problem.
> >
>
> Is this caused by the increased memory usage during input processing
> caused by the filter extension? I would be very interested in hearing
> what has caused PHP memory utilization to go up, since that will
> likely result in reduced performance as well.

No, it is not filter extension. As I said, a good example is to use
the pear command (list-all, package or install).

Also I do not think (neither said) that there is a 1.5x increase
factor. I was talking about reported memory usage. My point is that
the new system seems more accurate.

In general, with or without the new memory manager, I do think we
should increase this limit. Many common applications/usages reach it
already.

--Pierre