Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:25378 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 85174 invoked by uid 1010); 16 Aug 2006 13:39:59 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 85158 invoked from network); 16 Aug 2006 13:39:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 16 Aug 2006 13:39:59 -0000 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: sesser@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 81.169.145.174 natklopstock.rzone.de Solaris 10 (beta) Received: from [81.169.145.174] ([81.169.145.174:58699] helo=natklopstock.rzone.de) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.8 r(12549M)) with ESMTP id E0/63-11355-E1213E44 for ; Wed, 16 Aug 2006 08:39:59 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.77] (p508777EB.dip.t-dialin.net [80.135.119.235]) by post.webmailer.de (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k7GCdsek029582; Wed, 16 Aug 2006 14:39:54 +0200 (MEST) Message-ID: <44E3121B.7070904@php.net> Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 14:39:55 +0200 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pierre.php@gmail.com CC: internals@lists.php.net References: <20060816123006.4028b334@pierre-u64> In-Reply-To: <20060816123006.4028b334@pierre-u64> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] increase the default memory limit in 5.2.0+ From: sesser@php.net (Stefan Esser) Hello, > After having tested 5.2 and the new memory manager for a couple of > weeks, I notice a significant increase of the reported memory usage. As > a side effect, many applications reach the 8M memory limit. It can be > a problem. > > A good example is to compare the usage of a pear/pecl command between > 5.1 and 5.2. > The question is why do we want a new memory manager that seems to allocate 1.5 times more memory than the old one. I haven't looked into it yet, but for me this looks like a waste of ressources. What are the advantages of it. I really doubt, that a significant speed increase can be measured, and I wonder if it worth the waste of memory. Yours, Stefan Esser