Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:25181 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 73994 invoked by uid 1010); 3 Aug 2006 09:48:08 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 73979 invoked from network); 3 Aug 2006 09:48:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 3 Aug 2006 09:48:08 -0000 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: php-php-dev@m.gmane.org X-Host-Fingerprint: 80.91.229.2 main.gmane.org Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from ([80.91.229.2:52057] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.3 r(11751M)) with ESMTP id 91/25-44390-656C1D44 for ; Thu, 03 Aug 2006 05:48:07 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1G8Znu-0006fJ-5a for internals@lists.php.net; Thu, 03 Aug 2006 11:47:46 +0200 Received: from 85.19.74.66 ([85.19.74.66]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 03 Aug 2006 11:47:46 +0200 Received: from sb by 85.19.74.66 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 03 Aug 2006 11:47:46 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: internals@lists.php.net Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2006 11:47:22 +0200 Lines: 12 Message-ID: References: <18810497049.20060801234124@marcus-boerger.de> <44CFDB2B.1010907@cschneid.com> <20060802010156.5be0258c@pierre-u64> <44CFDF89.6010506@lerdorf.com> <7.0.1.0.2.20060802153119.0c2193c0@zend.com> <44D0DB82.1070307@lerdorf.com> <7.0.1.0.2.20060803104541.0853b1e0@zend.com> <20060803095558.49c4e484@pierre-u64> <44D1B055.5070905@php.net> <44D1B505.1010300@php.net> <44D1C2B3.7060504@cschneid.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 85.19.74.66 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060731) In-Reply-To: <44D1C2B3.7060504@cschneid.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Sender: news Subject: E_STRICT -> E_STRICT + E_DEPRECATED [was: Re: [PHP-DEV] RfC: rethink OO inheritance strictness] From: sb@sebastian-bergmann.de (Sebastian Bergmann) Christian Schneider wrote: > But like you I prefer the E_STRICT version without modifying the > language though. But I'm sharing Lukas' concern about the definition of > E_STRICT: Is it to be changed to E_ERROR at some point? Otherwise > E_NOTICE would be more appropriate IMHO. Not that I am advocating this, but one solution could be splitting E_STRICT into E_STRICT and E_DEPRECATED for the respective meanings. -- Sebastian Bergmann http://www.sebastian-bergmann.de/ GnuPG Key: 0xB85B5D69 / 27A7 2B14 09E4 98CD 6277 0E5B 6867 C514 B85B 5D69