Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:25137
Return-Path: <zeev@zend.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 95489 invoked by uid 1010); 2 Aug 2006 17:07:44 -0000
Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net
Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 95460 invoked from network); 2 Aug 2006 17:07:44 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 2 Aug 2006 17:07:44 -0000
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: zeev@zend.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 80.74.107.235 mail.zend.com Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4)
Received: from ([80.74.107.235:2519] helo=mail.zend.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.3 r(11751M)) with ESMTP
	id 72/B5-45114-CAAD0D44 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 02 Aug 2006 13:02:38 -0400
Received: (qmail 2369 invoked from network); 2 Aug 2006 17:01:30 -0000
Received: from localhost (HELO zeev-notebook.zend.com) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 2 Aug 2006 17:01:30 -0000
Message-ID: <7.0.1.0.2.20060802200141.084f4040@zend.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.1.0
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 20:02:32 +0300
To: Pierre <pierre.php@gmail.com>
Cc: "Robert Cummings" <robert@interjinn.com>,
 "Derick Rethans" <derick@php.net>,"Lukas Smith" <lsmith@php.net>,
 internals@lists.php.net
In-Reply-To: <fe05d1540608020822n3641caddj57d4e02d3d9e1189@mail.gmail.co
 m>
References: <EB.71.29121.B6690C44@pb1.pair.com>
 <18810497049.20060801234124@marcus-boerger.de>
 <1154478748.6599.16.camel@blobule>
 <Pine.LNX.4.62.0608020940590.26373@localhost>
 <E9.41.45114.FFB50D44@pb1.pair.com>
 <Pine.LNX.4.62.0608021138530.26373@localhost>
 <16.85.45114.FF370D44@pb1.pair.com>
 <7.0.1.0.2.20060802153423.0d046278@zend.com>
 <Pine.LNX.4.62.0608021454380.26373@localhost>
 <1154531954.3034.24.camel@blobule>
 <fe05d1540608020822n3641caddj57d4e02d3d9e1189@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RfC: rethink OO inheritance strictness
From: zeev@zend.com (Zeev Suraski)

At 18:22 02/08/2006, Pierre wrote:
>On 8/2/06, Robert Cummings <robert@interjinn.com> wrote:
>>On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 16:07 +0200, Derick Rethans wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2 Aug 2006, Zeev Suraski wrote:
>> >
>> > > My recommendation:
>> > > - Add a new flag to methods (at the implementation level) that 
>> will allow to
>> > > flag them as 'strict'
>> >
>> > Have an example of what you mean here?
>>
>>Maybe something like the following...
>>
>><?
>>
>>class foo
>>{
>>     function bleh( $p1, $p2 )
>>     {
>>         echo "Bleh: $p1, $p2\n";
>>     }
>>}
>>
>>class fee extends foo
>>{
>>     loose function bleh( $p1 )
>>     {
>>         parent::bleh( $p1, $this->prop );
>>     }
>>}
>>
>>?>
>>
>>I think I like it :D In this case,
>
>Except that I would prefer the other way 'round. The default should be
>the "loose one".

Yes, that's what I originally meant.  And as I mentioned, in my 
opinion that's not really all that necessary.  Those who care about 
this kind of stuff will tend to have E_STRICT enabled and will fix it anyway.

Zeev