Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:25110 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 21533 invoked by uid 1010); 2 Aug 2006 09:44:32 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 21518 invoked from network); 2 Aug 2006 09:44:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 2 Aug 2006 09:44:32 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 87.123.82.236 i577B52EC.versanet.de Received: from ([87.123.82.236:8024] helo=localhost.localdomain) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.3 r(11751M)) with ESMTP id 16/85-45114-FF370D44 for ; Wed, 02 Aug 2006 05:44:32 -0400 Message-ID: <16.85.45114.FF370D44@pb1.pair.com> To: internals@lists.php.net Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 11:44:29 +0200 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <18810497049.20060801234124@marcus-boerger.de> <1154478748.6599.16.camel@blobule> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Posted-By: 87.123.82.236 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RfC: rethink OO inheritance strictness From: lsmith@php.net (Lukas Smith) Derick Rethans wrote: > On Wed, 2 Aug 2006, Lukas Smith wrote: > >> again i feel that people who want to use PHP as a "proper" OO language will >> definately benefit from a strict mode if they are willing to put in the extra >> planning. however alienating the userbase for this by making it impossible to >> keep the old low planning OO style would be a bad idea. > > So then the only option is to introduce a > "i-dont-want-to-care-about-oo-in-my-classes-mode" for the people who > simply don't care. yes .. it should be possible to set this on a per class basis. and children should be able to change the mode. classes in lax mode might also return false unless the classes match exactly. regards, Lukas