Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:25104 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 85853 invoked by uid 1010); 2 Aug 2006 07:58:15 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 85838 invoked from network); 2 Aug 2006 07:58:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 2 Aug 2006 07:58:14 -0000 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: derick@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 82.94.239.5 jdi.jdi-ict.nl Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from ([82.94.239.5:45543] helo=jdi.jdi-ict.nl) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.3 r(11751M)) with ESMTP id C6/20-45114-46650D44 for ; Wed, 02 Aug 2006 03:38:14 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jdi.jdi-ict.nl (8.13.6/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k727c9ho019192; Wed, 2 Aug 2006 09:38:09 +0200 Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 09:37:56 +0200 (CEST) X-X-Sender: derick@localhost To: Christian Schneider cc: Marcus Boerger , internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: <44CFDB2B.1010907@cschneid.com> Message-ID: References: <18810497049.20060801234124@marcus-boerger.de> <44CFDB2B.1010907@cschneid.com> X-Face: "L'&?Ah3MYF@FB4hU'XhNhLB]222(Lbr2Y@F:GE[OO;"F5p>qtFBl|yVVA&D{A(g3[C}mG:199P+5C'v.M/u@Z\![0b:Mv.[l6[uWl' MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RfC: rethink OO inheritance strictness From: derick@php.net (Derick Rethans) On Wed, 2 Aug 2006, Christian Schneider wrote: > Marcus Boerger wrote: > > nobody forces you to use OO if you don't like it but it is as it is. And > > we cannot make it ignore its basic rules. It might be that you are lazy and > > PHP can and PHP did allow changing parameters when overriding functions. And > apart from pseudo-academical reasons nothing convincing was said why this > should be changed. Nobody forces you to change any parameters if you don't > want to ;-) You must have missed the couple of reasons why it *is* a bad idea in this thread then. Go look for them (Andi and Marcus both gave them). regards, Derick