Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:25056 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 13440 invoked by uid 1010); 29 Jul 2006 19:44:35 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 13425 invoked from network); 29 Jul 2006 19:44:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 29 Jul 2006 19:44:35 -0000 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: andi@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 80.74.107.235 mail.zend.com Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from ([80.74.107.235:29904] helo=mail.zend.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.3 r(11751M)) with ESMTP id 3B/ED-58709-2AABBC44 for ; Sat, 29 Jul 2006 15:44:35 -0400 Received: (qmail 6068 invoked from network); 29 Jul 2006 19:43:27 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ANDILENOVO) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 29 Jul 2006 19:43:27 -0000 To: "'Christian Wenz'" , Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 12:44:27 -0700 Message-ID: <004d01c6b347$68360b20$6600a8c0@zend.2k> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 Thread-Index: AcazLkhUfzz9iq6KR3SZO89QwuvejgAGOIFQ In-Reply-To: <44CB8BB8.7090202@hauser-wenz.de> Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] RE: CVS Account Request: cleong From: andi@zend.com ("Andi Gutmans") References: <44CB8BB8.7090202@hauser-wenz.de> As far as I know, and I might be wrong, ASP.NET uses a managed runtime .NET interface which does not use COM (It's the actual TDS protocol implemented in managed code). COM is viewed as poor way to run such interfaces both for performance reasons and resource reference counting resources. Andi > -----Original Message----- > From: Christian Wenz [mailto:chw@hauser-wenz.de] > Sent: Saturday, July 29, 2006 9:24 AM > To: internals@lists.php.net > Subject: [PHP-DEV] RE: CVS Account Request: cleong > > Hi Andi, > > ASP.NET is using OLEDB, as well, and in my experiences this > does not add to much penalty to communicating with MSSQL > (however obviously more exhaustive performance tests are > required). However I am wondering whether the OLEDB way would > still work on non-Windows PHP versions? If > not: Having two compatible, but internally completely > different MSSQL extensions for win32 and non-win32 sounds > dangerous to me. > > --Christian > > > Hi Chung, > > > > Any idea on the performance of OLEDB? My understanding was > that due to > > it going through the COM layer, performance will be relatively poor. > > > > Any idea? > > > > Andi > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Chung Leong [mailto:chernyshevsky@hotmail.com] > > > > > > Sent: Friday, July 28, 2006 2:37 PM > > > To: internals@lists.php.net > > > Subject: [PHP-DEV] CVS Account Request: cleong > > > > > > I would like to submit a replacement for the Win32 mssql > extension > > > that I have recently completed. The extension provides > the same set > > > of functions as mssql, but uses OLEDB to talk to > SQLServer instead > > > of DBLIB. It allows users to retrieve varchar column > wider than 255 > > > and also Unicode columns as UTF-8. > > > > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To > unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php >