Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:24965 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 64175 invoked by uid 1010); 25 Jul 2006 12:07:13 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 64160 invoked from network); 25 Jul 2006 12:07:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 25 Jul 2006 12:07:13 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=iliaal@gmail.com; domainkeys=good DomainKey-Status: good X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: iliaal@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 64.233.184.228 wr-out-0506.google.com Linux 2.4/2.6 Received: from ([64.233.184.228:20681] helo=wr-out-0506.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.3 r(11751M)) with ESMTP id 85/EA-04178-F6906C44 for ; Tue, 25 Jul 2006 08:07:12 -0400 Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 70so753877wra for ; Tue, 25 Jul 2006 05:07:09 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-priority:content-type:message-id:cc:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer:sender; b=Mek7SzS9jwEC8R8gfy8hx9Tv+hCNzx5X0xYIZu3tiupVA23ZmbGtDHgRxaQzBA5MZ2PHigWhkEFbq0otQvzjHjPEpr28npxD3GBU8YLFaolPrwYrmmJaX0G0mOzdBrrc18iG0eiOh2MR5rnGNKsXtsO07E3qXfkwW9EsJLaJANM= Received: by 10.65.147.1 with SMTP id z1mr2546389qbn; Tue, 25 Jul 2006 05:07:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.1.6? ( [72.59.8.142]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id a5sm646190qbd.2006.07.25.05.07.08; Tue, 25 Jul 2006 05:07:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <00d601c6af9d$c18f2d30$0201a8c0@pc1> References: <00d601c6af9d$c18f2d30$0201a8c0@pc1> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) X-Priority: 3 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-17--571633513 Message-ID: <380B7B14-A876-4DCA-A9A0-545D6DF8EB88@prohost.org> Cc: Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 08:07:05 -0400 To: Matt W X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Sender: Ilia Alshanetsky Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] memory_get_usage with new Memory Manager From: ilia@prohost.org (Ilia Alshanetsky) --Apple-Mail-17--571633513 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed On 24-Jul-06, at 11:52 PM, Matt W wrote: > Does anybody else think that memory_get[peak_]usage() should work > more like > before? I would imagine it can be "fixed" fairly easily, though it > probably > needs another variable, and just a little extra overhead of inc./ > dec. that > variable more often (but I think that was done in the old MM anyway?). I think that the current, more precise memory usage indicator is the correct behavior and should not be changed. Ilia Alshanetsky --Apple-Mail-17--571633513--