Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:24786 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 24038 invoked by uid 1010); 20 Jul 2006 22:47:34 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 24022 invoked from network); 20 Jul 2006 22:47:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 20 Jul 2006 22:47:34 -0000 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: lsmith@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.112.227.169 ipx11223.ipxserver.de Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from ([212.112.227.169:59332] helo=ipx11223.ipxserver.de) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.3 r(11751M)) with ESMTP id 83/93-29121-55300C44 for ; Thu, 20 Jul 2006 18:27:34 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ipx11223.ipxserver.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93B97DF0111; Fri, 21 Jul 2006 01:10:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ipx11223.ipxserver.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (flottensignalgeber [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 27752-04; Fri, 21 Jul 2006 01:10:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (i577B441B.versanet.de [87.123.68.27]) by ipx11223.ipxserver.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id EECC8DF010F; Fri, 21 Jul 2006 01:10:21 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <44C0034F.7070100@php.net> Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 00:27:27 +0200 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Derick Rethans Cc: Pierre , PHP Developers Mailing List References: <20060719173451.114d4528@pierre-u64> <1184012601.20060720095137@marcus-boerger.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by somedaemon at backendmedia.com Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Adding pecl/zip to 5.2 From: lsmith@php.net (Lukas Smith) Derick Rethans wrote: > On Thu, 20 Jul 2006, Pierre wrote: > >> Do you really ask me what Zip say? > > You miss the point. If you do "new Zip" ... then I've no idea what the > object you get represents. However, doing "new ZipArchive" makes sense > as then you know the object represents a ZipArchive for example. Just > "Zip" doesn't say anything about the object so I consider it a bad > classname. I am definately in the camp that wants zip handling in core, but I also think Derick's naming argument makes sense. regards, Lukas