Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:24783 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 8633 invoked by uid 1010); 20 Jul 2006 22:00:27 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 8617 invoked from network); 20 Jul 2006 22:00:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 20 Jul 2006 22:00:27 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 217.79.190.163 r163.red.fastwebserver.de Received: from ([217.79.190.163:22446] helo=localhost.localdomain) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.3 r(11751M)) with ESMTP id 0E/FF-29121-A48FFB44 for ; Thu, 20 Jul 2006 17:40:27 -0400 To: internals@lists.php.net,Marcus Boerger Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 23:40:18 +0200 Message-ID: <20060720234018.2f574149@pierre-u64> In-Reply-To: <836331626.20060720232658@marcus-boerger.de> References: <20060719173451.114d4528@pierre-u64> <20060720120508.7bb49a97@pierre-u64> <1064754716.20060720212730@marcus-boerger.de> <836331626.20060720232658@marcus-boerger.de> Reply-To: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Newsreader: Sylpheed-Claws 2.1.1 (GTK+ 2.8.18; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Posted-By: 217.79.190.163 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Adding pecl/zip to 5.2 From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre) Hello, On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 23:26:58 +0200 helly@php.net (Marcus Boerger) wrote: > I am but you obviously prefer to bring instable suff into core or what > now? Until now my idea of Zip was a stable idea so you could easily > have removed the tag file. The above said makes me thing that it is > far away from stable otherwise you wouldn't again have insulted the > one who did not share your opinion and that even without > reason....calm down relax and play nicely I play nicely and I'm not calm. You are clearly turning this simple question into a personal FUD. Like you did about the zip stream in pecl list (yes, I give you another reason to shoot it down). I will move to beta when we (the users and I) consider that the API will not change. That means that one can use in production without the risk to break everything on update. About the stability of the code, I think this extension is way more stable than its predecessor (which was in core) and as stable as many recent additions (from pecl or not). About adding experimental extension in ""core"", then please make a proposal. It will make other people start to release beta/stable package of untested code and without any users feedback about the API (which always ends to BC breaks). I'm not sure I'm going to like that. Cheers, -- Pierre