Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:24774 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 23046 invoked by uid 1010); 20 Jul 2006 20:14:05 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 23031 invoked from network); 20 Jul 2006 20:14:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 20 Jul 2006 20:14:05 -0000 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: helly@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 81.169.182.136 ajaxatwork.net Linux 2.4/2.6 Received: from ([81.169.182.136:55697] helo=strato.aixcept.de) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.3 r(11751M)) with ESMTP id E8/A9-29121-B04EFB44 for ; Thu, 20 Jul 2006 16:14:04 -0400 Received: from baumbart.mbo (dslb-084-063-032-043.pools.arcor-ip.net [84.63.32.43]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by strato.aixcept.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C6CD35C201; Thu, 20 Jul 2006 22:14:00 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 22:14:16 +0200 Reply-To: Marcus Boerger X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1593815407.20060720221416@marcus-boerger.de> To: Andrei Zmievski Cc: PHP Internals , Ilia Alshanetsky In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Varargs parameter parsing for 5.2 From: helly@php.net (Marcus Boerger) Hello Andrei, i like the idea and it can replace the implementation in gtk and is also needed to move more array functions to the new parameter parsing api. Having the stuff in 5.2 already allows easier migration imo. best regards marcus Thursday, July 20, 2006, 5:44:41 PM, you wrote: > You probably have seen my HEAD patches to parameter parsing API that > implement varargs support. I was thinking this functionality could be > useful for PHP 5 as well. I've tested it pretty thoroughly and there > should be no breakage. Any thoughts on including it?