Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:24741 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 6431 invoked by uid 1010); 20 Jul 2006 07:45:41 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 6415 invoked from network); 20 Jul 2006 07:45:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 20 Jul 2006 07:45:41 -0000 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: derick@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 82.94.239.5 jdi.jdi-ict.nl Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from ([82.94.239.5:56439] helo=jdi.jdi-ict.nl) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.3 r(11751M)) with ESMTP id 53/BB-29121-2A43FB44 for ; Thu, 20 Jul 2006 03:45:40 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jdi.jdi-ict.nl (8.13.6/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k6K7jBT2009023; Thu, 20 Jul 2006 09:45:11 +0200 Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 09:43:39 +0200 (CEST) X-X-Sender: derick@localhost To: Antony Dovgal cc: pierre.php@gmail.com, PHP Developers Mailing List In-Reply-To: <44BE56EF.9060908@zend.com> Message-ID: References: <20060719173451.114d4528@pierre-u64> <44BE56EF.9060908@zend.com> X-Face: "L'&?Ah3MYF@FB4hU'XhNhLB]222(Lbr2Y@F:GE[OO;"F5p>qtFBl|yVVA&D{A(g3[C}mG:199P+5C'v.M/u@Z\![0b:Mv.[l6[uWl' MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Adding pecl/zip to 5.2 From: derick@php.net (Derick Rethans) On Wed, 19 Jul 2006, Antony Dovgal wrote: > On 19.07.2006 18:34, Pierre wrote: > > Hello, > > > > > > Many people (incl. php devs) asked me if I can include zip in 5.2.0. > > Ilia thought it was too late in the game and planed to do it in 5.2.1. > > > > I like to have it in, as experimental. > > > > Please note that it intoduces a new class called Zip, but I never saw a > > php zip implementation named Zip. > > > > +1/-1/0? > > -0. > > I would rather move more extensions from core to PECL, than from PECL to core. I agree here, I am also not sure whether picking the extremely short classname Zip is actually a good thing. Perhaps ZipArchive or ZipFile would be more fitting in the first place, not even considering the issue you can have with other libraries. Complaining against the name "Date" and then just going in another ext with "Zip" just feels wrong. Although the zip ext is a useful thing to have, I think it should stay in PECL as Tony says we're trying to move things to PECL... so a -1 from me on the current proposal to add ext/zip to core with the Zip classname. Derick -- Derick Rethans http://derickrethans.nl | http://ez.no | http://xdebug.org