Newsgroups: php.internals,php.pear.dev Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:2456 php.pear.dev:17587 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 7134 invoked from network); 20 Jun 2003 06:56:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.bauer-kirch.de) (80.237.234.121) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 20 Jun 2003 06:56:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 16791 invoked from network); 20 Jun 2003 06:56:45 -0000 Received: from somewhere (IP somewhere) by mail.bauer-kirch.de with SMTP; 20 Jun 2003 06:56:45 -0000 Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 08:56:30 +0200 To: pear-dev@lists.php.net, internals@lists.php.net Message-ID: <20030620065630.GA8912@martinjansen.com> Mail-Followup-To: pear-dev@lists.php.net, internals@lists.php.net References: <395336819.20030619011936@idecnet.com> <20030619022743.GA17288@csh.rit.edu> <471866430.20030619135935@idecnet.com> <20030619195001.GB28952@csh.rit.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030619195001.GB28952@csh.rit.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i Subject: Re: [PEAR-DEV] [RFC] Binary pecl packages From: mj@php.net (Martin Jansen) On Thu Jun 19, 2003 at 03:5002PM -0400, Jon Parise wrote: > On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 01:59:35PM +0200, Tomas V.V.Cox wrote: > > Let's say something like: > > > > pear package [-t ] [-b] [-s] > > > > -t The type of package you want to generate (pear, rpm, > > msi, etc) > > -b Specifies a binary package > > -d Only generate the description package file > > I think this sounds good. The 'pear makerpm' command could be > deprecated in favor of using the above, and this scheme allows more > flexibility moving forward. Agreed. Just a minor note: If the -t option isn't specified, it should default to "-t pear", as packaging this format will happen most times, imo. -- - Martin Martin Jansen http://martinjansen.com/