Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:24547 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 77250 invoked by uid 1010); 18 Jul 2006 21:42:57 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 77234 invoked from network); 18 Jul 2006 21:42:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 18 Jul 2006 21:42:57 -0000 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: edink@emini.dk X-Host-Fingerprint: 192.38.9.232 gw2.emini.dk Linux 2.4/2.6 Received: from ([192.38.9.232:5980] helo=gw2.emini.dk) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.3 r(11751M)) with ESMTP id 6F/5F-11992-FD55DB44 for ; Tue, 18 Jul 2006 17:42:57 -0400 Received: from [10.0.0.11] (gw1.emini.dk [212.242.124.121]) by gw2.emini.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49399BB699; Tue, 18 Jul 2006 23:42:52 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <44BD55DE.40503@emini.dk> Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 23:42:54 +0200 Organization: Emini A/S User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John Coggeshall Cc: Pierre , Jani Taskinen , Derick Rethans , PHP Developers Mailing List References: <20060718153249.316a3961@pierre-u64> <8af368ea38b3436c34c728fd139e775d@gravitonic.com> <40ec95eb2b3b17626ab0a4808f4ecf13@gravitonic.com> <1153256210.6734.65.camel@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <1153256210.6734.65.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Stepping in as RM for our PHP 4 branche From: edink@emini.dk (Edin Kadribasic) John Coggeshall wrote: > On Tue, 2006-07-18 at 22:41 +0200, Pierre wrote: > >>Yes, and in my book, my team collegues answer mails, don't ignore >>users question and inform the rest of the team of their plans. If you >>read the archives you will see that none of these points has been >>fullfilled in the past 5 months. > > > Not to be a jerk, but things that don't fall under the category of > discussing the technical merits of decisions for PHP should probably be > taken offlist. Which forum you think should be used for evaluating/selecting a Release Master? Edin