Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:2440
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Message-ID: <3EF204D9.2000808@caraveo.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 11:45:45 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Marcus_B=F6rger?= <helly@php.net>
CC: Sterling Hughes <sterling@bumblebury.com>, internals@lists.php.net
References: <1055981706.8233.10.camel@hasele> <1066290321.20030619154615@post.rwth-aachen.de>
In-Reply-To: <1066290321.20030619154615@post.rwth-aachen.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] php5 beta
From: shane@caraveo.com (Shane Caraveo)

+0  While I really like the idea, auto-exceptions for errors would mess=20
up library code that isn't written to use exceptions.  If that problem=20
can be dealt with correctly, then I'd be +1.  Otherwise, we need a new=20
error level.
Shane

Marcus B=F6rger wrote:
> Hello Sterling,
>=20
> We need exceptions instead of errors whenever a try/catch block is
> entered or a constructor gets called. This is a very easy thing to
> implement but we need a consensus before doing so.
>=20
> regards
> marcus
>=20
> p.s.: And i'd still like to have final classes
>=20
> Thursday, June 19, 2003, 2:15:06 AM, you wrote:
>=20
> SH> This is what I can think of for a concrete todo before the beta... =
=20
>=20
> SH> http://www.php.net/~sterling/php5/BETA
>=20
> SH> any thing i missed? anything extraeneous?
>=20
> SH> -Sterling
> SH> --=20
> SH> "Nothing is particularly hard if you divide it into small jobs."=20
> SH>     - Henry Ford
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20