Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:24060 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 86446 invoked by uid 1010); 9 Jun 2006 22:18:58 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 86430 invoked from network); 9 Jun 2006 22:18:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 9 Jun 2006 22:18:58 -0000 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: andi@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 80.74.107.235 mail.zend.com Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from ([80.74.107.235:5833] helo=mail.zend.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP id 28/1D-30619-1D3F9844 for ; Fri, 09 Jun 2006 18:18:57 -0400 Received: (qmail 23482 invoked from network); 9 Jun 2006 22:18:24 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ANDI-NOTEBOOK.zend.com) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 9 Jun 2006 22:18:24 -0000 Message-ID: <7.0.1.0.2.20060609151753.03a710e0@zend.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.1.0 Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 15:18:43 -0700 To: Lukas Smith Cc: Steph Fox ,Nuno Lopes , Andrei Zmievski ,helly@php.net, Derick Rethans ,internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: <4489ED8D.9090000@php.net> References: <7.0.1.0.2.20060608162444.06db8390@zend.com> <7.0.1.0.2.20060609065445.0371fe28@zend.com> <35340f912d5d4405f2da5183d804f165@gravitonic.com> <008d01c68bfe$1bc02890$0100a8c0@pc07653> <17e201c68c01$4c0d8c10$6602a8c0@foxbox> <7.0.1.0.2.20060609132442.03b41010@zend.com> <4489ED8D.9090000@php.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] SPL docs From: andi@zend.com (Andi Gutmans) Yeah API docs is useful, but still we should have the end-user docs in the PHP manual. I don't think once comes instead of the other. The end-user docs is especially useful as people in the community can give comments, etc... At 02:52 PM 6/9/2006, Lukas Smith wrote: >Andi Gutmans wrote: >>Hey, >>I'm obviously not an expert on this stuff so I don't have much >>added value to add. However, I think from a high-level I think it's >>important that we have one PHP manual and that the manual covers >>both functional and oo extensions. I think the last thing we want >>is to have several PHP manuals. >>My $.02. Now I'll shut up :) > >Well PEAR is far from being able to claim that it has solved its >documentation problems. However I generally think that its ok to >have different tools for API documentation and end user "tutorial" >style documentation. However I guess the main stumbling block is >that the PEAR API documentation is currently generated directly from >the source which does not really lend itself well for translations. >It also means that we have documentation for every single version >ever released. However at least I have not been good about noting >when features have been added. Also doxygen produces much nicer >inheritance graphs than what we currently have. > >regards, >Lukas