Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:23984 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 67886 invoked by uid 1010); 7 Jun 2006 22:26:27 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 67871 invoked from network); 7 Jun 2006 22:26:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 7 Jun 2006 22:26:27 -0000 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: antony@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 80.74.107.235 mail.zend.com Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from ([80.74.107.235:8305] helo=mail.zend.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP id 73/97-00946-19257844 for ; Wed, 07 Jun 2006 18:26:27 -0400 Received: (qmail 17350 invoked from network); 7 Jun 2006 22:25:53 -0000 Received: from internal.zend.office (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (10.1.1.1) by internal.zend.office with SMTP; 7 Jun 2006 22:25:53 -0000 Message-ID: <44875289.3040705@zend.com> Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2006 02:26:17 +0400 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060516) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Spruiell CC: PHP Internals List References: <2237.192.168.1.102.1149706395.squirrel@192.168.1.3> <44874B8F.6020801@zend.com> <44874D44.8060409@zend.com> <3090.192.168.1.102.1149714826.squirrel@192.168.1.3> In-Reply-To: <3090.192.168.1.102.1149714826.squirrel@192.168.1.3> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Compilation failure on AIX with 5.1.4 From: antony@zend.com (Antony Dovgal) On 08.06.2006 01:13, Mark Spruiell wrote: > On 08.06.2006 01:56, Antony Dovgal wrote: > >> Do you have a patch? > > I was a bit concerned about the fact that these are > bison-generated files. Doesn't that imply a bug in > whatever version of bison was used to generate these > files? And wouldn't the bug instantly reappear as soon > as these files are regenerated for whatever reason? Well, your second phrase is the answer for this question. >> And yes, I forgot to add that: it works perfectly fine here, on AIX 5.3. > > Perhaps it's a difference in our compilers. I'm using IBM's > VisualAge C compiler. -- Wbr, Antony Dovgal