Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:23923 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 12264 invoked by uid 1010); 4 Jun 2006 12:16:03 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 12249 invoked from network); 4 Jun 2006 12:16:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 4 Jun 2006 12:16:02 -0000 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: helly@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 81.169.182.136 ajaxatwork.net Linux 2.4/2.6 Received: from ([81.169.182.136:60980] helo=strato.aixcept.de) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP id 83/94-49656-20FC2844 for ; Sun, 04 Jun 2006 08:16:02 -0400 Received: from baumbart.mbo (dslb-084-063-007-047.pools.arcor-ip.net [84.63.7.47]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by strato.aixcept.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBE5B35C1E2; Sun, 4 Jun 2006 14:15:59 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2006 14:18:22 +0200 Reply-To: Marcus Boerger X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1912643046.20060604141822@marcus-boerger.de> To: Pierre Cc: internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: References: <795156743.20060603134212@marcus-boerger.de> <509342741.20060603183859@marcus-boerger.de> <7.0.1.0.2.20060603175211.02208a50@zend.com> <20060604030100.1093d2f9@pierre-u64> <7.0.1.0.2.20060603181129.0396fc18@zend.com> <44823B41.5000608@akbkhome.com> <44823C51.7040408@lerdorf.com> <64299052.20060604120852@marcus-boerger.de> <20060604135241.3beacb32@pierre-u64> <1853717276.20060604140317@marcus-boerger.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Missing __toString() part From: helly@php.net (Marcus Boerger) Hello Pierre, Sunday, June 4, 2006, 2:05:52 PM, you wrote: > On 6/4/06, Marcus Boerger wrote: >> Adding a function hash_from_object() or spl_hash_from object() to ease >> > the generations of hashes is indeed a good idea. There is no impact in >> > the objects managements and people are free to use it or not (no magic >> > default behaviors). >> >> Hence i wrote "For PHP 5.2 we **could** think"... > Yes, and what's the point of this answer? You reply didn't sound like you understood what i wrote. Having a vote from you makes your thoughts clear also i got it like that already. And just in case anybody is interested in my voting: ~0 for any magic changes ~0 for __toHash/whatever will be the name of this method +1 to keep $a[(string)$o] +1 for an extra (and extern) function to get an unique hash of an object