Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:23915
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
	s=beta; d=gmail.com;
	h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
	b=mJWCNmyD1rX+eYWf44cLqstIBLykQksRHDjE4UFKTZVpoS8FqUylgx9eSkgtOUvuThaz0jt5CzqRJnyp20UDreW4ZAxwgyq9WSiOrC8OgW6qUNIY0HwppOXGMxSEwvTrQPQyosiUlHnpL9YDZ7SHzrASblhnCE07ttjaKotq8lY=
Message-ID: <7e72c4a60606040417t4c094351i22d9868fcbd02b17@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2006 13:17:55 +0200
To: internals@lists.php.net
In-Reply-To: <462553891.20060603123801@marcus-boerger.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_14709_16096733.1149419875447"
References: <18210000279.20060527232743@marcus-boerger.de>
	<fe05d1540605271432k7af1dac4se96a55a3d7b9ea08@mail.gmail.com>
	<4478C650.7000403@teh.ath.cx>
	<1421594360.20060527235241@marcus-boerger.de>
	<7.0.1.0.2.20060530202530.03871ca8@zend.com>
	<462553891.20060603123801@marcus-boerger.de>
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC array functions
From: eofredj@gmail.com ("Eric Fredj")

------=_Part_14709_16096733.1149419875447
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Hi,

Took from Java world, it could be something like array_has_next() which is
more significant because return boolean is only about the next value not
about all the next values.

On 6/3/06, Marcus Boerger <helly@php.net> wrote:
>
> Hello Andi,
>
> Wednesday, May 31, 2006, 5:28:47 AM, you wrote:
>
> > Zeev and I designed each() to deprecate key()/current()/etc. which
> > came from PHP/FI 2. Maybe not exactly what you're looking for but
> > just want to point out that there have always been some issues with
> > the latter functions.
> > If each() isn't suitable (and/or you want something quicker) than I'm
> > OK with an array_* function but I don't like array_valid(). It sounds
> > too much like is_array() and implies the array is valid. Maybe
> > something like array_valid_position()?
>
> Also good, i just chose the name becuase it's close to Iterator::valid().
> I am however more interested in the array_has_more() thingie. Often enough
> one runs into a problem where the last entry of a list has a slightly
> different behavior.
>
> > At 02:52 PM 5/27/2006, Marcus Boerger wrote:
> >>Hello Matthew,
> >>
> >>Saturday, May 27, 2006, 11:36:16 PM, you wrote:
> >>
> >> > Pierre wrote:
> >> >> On 5/27/06, Marcus Boerger <helly@php.net> wrote:
> >> >>> - bool array(array $array)
> >> >>>
> >> >>>   cehcks whether arra position is valid (e.g. like "key($array) !==
> >> >>> NULL")
> >> >>
> >> >> I don't understand this one.
> >> >>
> >>
> >> > I think you have to listen to psychedelic music and take a hit of
> >> LSD first.
> >>
> >>Actually the point is that you cannot simply do stuff like
> >>"while(key($array))". And "while(key($array) != 0)" doesn't work either.
> >>Also "if (!key($array))" is probably different from what you expect.
> >>And of course "isset(key($array))" doens't work either.
> >>
> >>Best regards,
> >>  Marcus
> >>
> >>--
> >>PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> >>To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>
>
>
> Best regards,
> Marcus
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>

------=_Part_14709_16096733.1149419875447--