Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:23807 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 70381 invoked by uid 1010); 31 May 2006 02:43:05 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 70366 invoked from network); 31 May 2006 02:43:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 31 May 2006 02:43:05 -0000 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pollita@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 65.111.164.201 unknown Linux 2.4/2.6 Received: from ([65.111.164.201:33858] helo=danica.alphaweb.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP id BB/87-07504-9B20D744 for ; Tue, 30 May 2006 22:43:05 -0400 Received: from talos.alphaweb.net ([69.12.155.129] helo=OHRLVN4523SG) by danica.alphaweb.net with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_MD5:16) (Exim 4.50) id 1FlGfM-00071V-Vs; Tue, 30 May 2006 22:42:37 -0400 Message-ID: <003c01c6845b$edbbb530$88051fac@OHRLVN4523SG> To: "Steph Fox" Cc: References: <649570026.20060531004803@marcus-boerger.de> <06d401c68453$b518a100$6602a8c0@foxbox> Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 19:42:55 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="Windows-1252"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2670 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] E_STRICT From: pollita@php.net ("Sara Golemon") >> right now the fate of E_STRICT error messages is uncertain. A few >> people think those should change to fatal after a reasonable amount of >> time, is two years (e.g. 5.0.0) reasonable. A few even think a minor >> version like 5.1 to 5.2 is enough but the majortiy (at least i guess >> so) wants the change only on a major version change like 5.0 to 6.0. > > I'd back the majority over this. Changes from E_STRICT to fatal in minor > versions is out of the question; most people still use PHP 4.3.*, and this > is something you're failing to consider here. > So that'd be a major version bump for them. :) -Sara Let them eat cake.