Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:23723 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 89391 invoked by uid 1010); 27 May 2006 16:09:52 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 89375 invoked from network); 27 May 2006 16:09:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 27 May 2006 16:09:52 -0000 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: helly@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 81.169.182.136 ajaxatwork.net Linux 2.4/2.6 Received: from ([81.169.182.136:37561] helo=strato.aixcept.de) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP id 34/AC-17316-0D978744 for ; Sat, 27 May 2006 12:09:52 -0400 Received: from baumbart.mbo (dslb-084-063-013-138.pools.arcor-ip.net [84.63.13.138]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by strato.aixcept.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39D1D35C1DC; Sat, 27 May 2006 18:09:48 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 18:08:01 +0200 Reply-To: Marcus Boerger X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <714117916.20060527180801@marcus-boerger.de> To: Pierre Cc: internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: References: <105972103.20060527171208@marcus-boerger.de> <4e89b4260605270839o5429cd76n7fdb588ee6b2125c@mail.gmail.com> <4e89b4260605270858n17940478q2b3bb82b2bbb519c@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] CVS Account Request: merlin From: helly@php.net (Marcus Boerger) Hello Pierre, everything will be only. At least on code.google.com in a bit if you don't let me continue to do th eadminstration part... Saturday, May 27, 2006, 6:01:11 PM, you wrote: > On 5/27/06, Wez Furlong wrote: >> The whole point of the mentor is to streamline the process of getting >> new blood into a project; I see no reason to make it more difficult by >> being too rigid. > It is not being rigid to ask some more transparency. We had reasons to > define these simple rules, I don't reasons to forget them for SoC. > We are not asking the mood, but some codes and a roadmap. Something to > show us what is the project etc. like in any other previous proposals. > --Pierre Best regards, Marcus