Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:23690
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 10:48:34 +0200
Reply-To: Marcus Boerger <helly@php.net>
Message-ID: <467043696.20060526104834@marcus-boerger.de>
To: Robert Amos <shiznatz@gmail.com>
Cc: internals@lists.php.net
In-Reply-To: <1944df00605252038j2b19f029h6dc455c59eea320@mail.gmail.com>
References: <7.0.1.0.2.20060523034511.07f184b0@zend.com> <989944118.20060523202907@marcus-boerger.de> <7.0.1.0.2.20060525140046.09161b78@zend.com> <157365036.20060525224444@marcus-boerger.de> <7.0.1.0.2.20060526004903.0bce8a30@zend.com> <391440291.20060526004209@marcus-boerger.de> <1944df00605252038j2b19f029h6dc455c59eea320@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] ze1 compatibility mode
From: helly@php.net (Marcus Boerger)

Hello Robert,

  when we first wrote the 6.0 list we were barely at 5.1. When we started
to work towards 5.2 we came up with a new list.

Friday, May 26, 2006, 5:38:55 AM, you wrote:

> I can't find any references to a discussion on this either.

Once again it was on the list and nobody was interested.

> This change was also on the list for 6 and has been completed, would that
> not be a better time to do this?

> -bok

> On 5/26/06, Marcus Boerger <helly@php.net> wrote:
>>
>> Hello Zeev,
>>
>> Thursday, May 25, 2006, 11:51:44 PM, you wrote:
>>
>> > At 23:44 25/05/2006, Marcus Boerger wrote:
>> >>Hello Zeev,
>> >>
>> >>Thursday, May 25, 2006, 1:04:59 PM, you wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > At 21:29 23/05/2006, Marcus Boerger wrote:
>> >> >>Hello Zeev,
>> >> >>
>> >> >>See here: http://oss.backendmedia.com/PhP52
>> >> >>     12. 4. Drop ZE1 compatibility Done (marcus)
>> >>
>> >> > (Sorry for the slow response, I'm traveling)
>> >>
>> >> > Yeah that's fine, but it was never discussed at all let alone decided
>> >> > upon...  IMHO it doesn't make sense to remove that in PHP 5.x - it's
>> >> > not a great feature, but some people are using it, and we're not
>> >> > gaining anything from making their lives more difficult.
>> >>
>> >> > Can you please revert this patch, and only remove it in PHP 6.0
>> >> as we agreed?
>> >>
>> >>No i cannot. And there was an open discussion. And you weren't intersted
>> at
>> >>that time.
>>
>> > As I said, can you point me to that open discussion?  I found no
>> > references to it of any sort.  The first email that mentioned it is
>> > from Ilia, listing a list of things for PHP 5.2, with this among
>> > them.  Just in case it's not clear, that does not constitute discussion
>> :)
>>
>> What does, if you agree or anybody else in particular? We have put it
>> on our todo and i acted on behalf of that. And for the same reson that
>> i dropped E_STRICT from E_ALL i am not reverting that patch. Sorry but
>> it has been the php way the silent acceptance. I would really like to
>> change to a more formal way which is why i really really like stuff
>> like the above mentioned site.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Marcus
>>
>> --
>> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
>> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>>
>>





Best regards,
 Marcus