Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:23683
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
	s=beta; d=gmail.com;
	h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
	b=MhXHRrO1iv1NUOC/Eg+ioyf4OQkPDDdlkX+4JEmYp8szek1azgmP4xzCkVgeRVxs+GSYkqKSzGjCJZjYIhIOeQTILVvpKtFgwXXplxq7N8+XDMPmOwTwl1Z69pKyqgM53abF4+HXLOSBHu3wdSQUUCs5NQsCMqJdvZ3xYx3Wtsk=
Message-ID: <1944df00605252038j2b19f029h6dc455c59eea320@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 13:38:55 +1000
To: internals@lists.php.net
In-Reply-To: <391440291.20060526004209@marcus-boerger.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_50823_22809207.1148614735622"
References: <7.0.1.0.2.20060523034511.07f184b0@zend.com>
	<989944118.20060523202907@marcus-boerger.de>
	<7.0.1.0.2.20060525140046.09161b78@zend.com>
	<157365036.20060525224444@marcus-boerger.de>
	<7.0.1.0.2.20060526004903.0bce8a30@zend.com>
	<391440291.20060526004209@marcus-boerger.de>
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] ze1 compatibility mode
From: shiznatz@gmail.com ("Robert Amos")

------=_Part_50823_22809207.1148614735622
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

I can't find any references to a discussion on this either.

This change was also on the list for 6 and has been completed, would that
not be a better time to do this?

-bok

On 5/26/06, Marcus Boerger <helly@php.net> wrote:
>
> Hello Zeev,
>
> Thursday, May 25, 2006, 11:51:44 PM, you wrote:
>
> > At 23:44 25/05/2006, Marcus Boerger wrote:
> >>Hello Zeev,
> >>
> >>Thursday, May 25, 2006, 1:04:59 PM, you wrote:
> >>
> >> > At 21:29 23/05/2006, Marcus Boerger wrote:
> >> >>Hello Zeev,
> >> >>
> >> >>See here: http://oss.backendmedia.com/PhP52
> >> >>     12. 4. Drop ZE1 compatibility Done (marcus)
> >>
> >> > (Sorry for the slow response, I'm traveling)
> >>
> >> > Yeah that's fine, but it was never discussed at all let alone decide=
d
> >> > upon...  IMHO it doesn't make sense to remove that in PHP 5.x - it's
> >> > not a great feature, but some people are using it, and we're not
> >> > gaining anything from making their lives more difficult.
> >>
> >> > Can you please revert this patch, and only remove it in PHP 6.0
> >> as we agreed?
> >>
> >>No i cannot. And there was an open discussion. And you weren't interste=
d
> at
> >>that time.
>
> > As I said, can you point me to that open discussion?  I found no
> > references to it of any sort.  The first email that mentioned it is
> > from Ilia, listing a list of things for PHP 5.2, with this among
> > them.  Just in case it's not clear, that does not constitute discussion
> :)
>
> What does, if you agree or anybody else in particular? We have put it
> on our todo and i acted on behalf of that. And for the same reson that
> i dropped E_STRICT from E_ALL i am not reverting that patch. Sorry but
> it has been the php way the silent acceptance. I would really like to
> change to a more formal way which is why i really really like stuff
> like the above mentioned site.
>
> Best regards,
> Marcus
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>


--=20
Xnyo - http://xnyo.odynia.org/

------=_Part_50823_22809207.1148614735622--