Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:23679 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 98708 invoked by uid 1010); 26 May 2006 02:28:39 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 98692 invoked from network); 26 May 2006 02:28:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 26 May 2006 02:28:39 -0000 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: iamstever@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 66.249.92.174 ug-out-1314.google.com Linux 2.4/2.6 Received: from ([66.249.92.174:61838] helo=ug-out-1314.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP id FA/58-17316-7D766744 for ; Thu, 25 May 2006 22:28:39 -0400 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id m2so599099ugc for ; Thu, 25 May 2006 19:28:35 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=cXXhNd2+b1nhVwA2P3pnLv9oo5D3wGSS7udOeYgekByfY5yCBecjhvZmodkwPz6AKVClGibwjdOVunL/xhfNzTbJmlqiPQOY6b4ZB84YBGr1PKgICifMnnhmfGqLE+4bMlkCjK4S1NKwk/BqqUXr6Voqcof71F5cawRUsgAcD1g= Received: by 10.67.100.19 with SMTP id c19mr1166073ugm; Thu, 25 May 2006 19:28:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.67.31.5 with HTTP; Thu, 25 May 2006 19:28:35 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <57792e850605251928l18e540b4w53562ca12e733f55@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 19:28:35 -0700 To: internals@lists.php.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: How critical does a bug need to be to warrant a new PHP release (like 5.1.5)? From: iamstever@gmail.com (steve) How critical does a bug need to be to warrant a new PHP release (like 5.1.5)? Are there specific criteria already laid out?