Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:23625
Return-Path: <helly@php.net>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 33137 invoked by uid 1010); 23 May 2006 18:31:10 -0000
Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net
Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 33122 invoked from network); 23 May 2006 18:31:10 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 23 May 2006 18:31:10 -0000
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: helly@php.net
X-Host-Fingerprint: 81.169.182.136 ajaxatwork.net Linux 2.4/2.6
Received: from ([81.169.182.136:53748] helo=strato.aixcept.de)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP
	id 4E/A8-19568-CE453744 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Tue, 23 May 2006 14:31:09 -0400
Received: from baumbart.mbo (dslb-084-063-042-062.pools.arcor-ip.net [84.63.42.62])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by strato.aixcept.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 340A835C1EB;
	Tue, 23 May 2006 20:31:06 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 20:29:07 +0200
Reply-To: Marcus Boerger <helly@php.net>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: <989944118.20060523202907@marcus-boerger.de>
To: Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com>
Cc: internals@lists.php.net
In-Reply-To: <7.0.1.0.2.20060523034511.07f184b0@zend.com>
References: <7.0.1.0.2.20060523034511.07f184b0@zend.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] ze1 compatibility mode
From: helly@php.net (Marcus Boerger)

Hello Zeev,

See here: http://oss.backendmedia.com/PhP52
    12. 4. Drop ZE1 compatibility Done (marcus)

And here:
    http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=php-dev&m=114695447815299&w=2

Usually we just direct these kinds of questions with 'check the archives'
:-)

regards
marcus


Tuesday, May 23, 2006, 2:46:40 AM, you wrote:

> Guys,

> I know I'm a late bloomer on this one, but when did we discuss the 
> discontinuation of ze1 compatibility mode within the 5.x branch?  I 
> recall we agreed to remove it for 6.0, but removing such a thing in 
> 5.x seems very counterintuitive and counterproductive.

> If anybody can point me to a discussion that took place I'll (do my 
> bes to) shut up.

> Zeev




Best regards,
 Marcus