Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:23513
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Reply-To: bu@orbitel.bg
To: internals@lists.php.net
Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 10:53:33 +0300
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1
References: <6C67DAD9-B812-415A-BFD6-A4E963371551@prohost.org>
In-Reply-To: <6C67DAD9-B812-415A-BFD6-A4E963371551@prohost.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
	boundary="nextPart2833162.N9K6sdUk4p";
	protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <200605171053.37630.bu@orbitel.bg>
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Flamewar Summary
From: bu@orbitel.bg (Petar Nedyalkov)

--nextPart2833162.N9K6sdUk4p
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Wednesday 17 May 2006 02:26, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
> There are 2 PHP 5.2 changes there has been a lot of back and forth
> flaming going around and we need to finally come to a decision about.
>
> The two topics are:
>
> Inclusion of E_STRICT and E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR into E_ALL

+1

> Addition of support for dynamic statics ala: class foo {} foo::$bar =3D 1;

=2D1

I already gave my opinion on that.

>
> So please throw in your +1/-1 so, that we can have a conclusion on
> these matters.
>
> Personally, I am against both changes.
>
> I think the error reporting level change is too major change for a
> minor release such as 5.2 and will cause problems for all the people
> who use things like E_ALL &~ E_NOTICE and will now
> see E_STRICT messages that is not their intent to see, with the
> setting they are only anticipating warnings and errors. Given that
> most people don't bother to turn of displaying of errors, it could
> have an affect on quite a few applications, very few big PHP apps can
> run without generating any E_STRICT messages.
>
> As far as statics, there are no BC reasons not to do it that I can
> think of, but it just seems wrong to me from a design perspective to
> allow dynamic creation of static object properties.
>
> Ilia Alshanetsky
> Advanced Internet Designs Inc.
> ilia@prohost.org
>
> P.S. Please stay on topic.

=2D-=20

Cyberly yours,
Petar Nedyalkov
Devoted Orbitel Fan :-)

PGP ID: 7AE45436
PGP Public Key: http://bu.orbitel.bg/pgp/bu.asc
PGP Fingerprint: 7923 8D52 B145 02E8 6F63 8BDA 2D3F 7C0B 7AE4 5436

--nextPart2833162.N9K6sdUk4p
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBEataBLT98C3rkVDYRArpoAJ4lNHHAyN6b/77HodRTBZTGTSwyhACeJZdh
wpawgoDGc4z43aEiRec+e68=
=VNle
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart2833162.N9K6sdUk4p--