Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:23457 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 45192 invoked by uid 1010); 16 May 2006 14:21:03 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 45177 invoked from network); 16 May 2006 14:21:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 16 May 2006 14:21:03 -0000 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: php-php-dev@m.gmane.org X-Host-Fingerprint: 80.91.229.2 main.gmane.org Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from ([80.91.229.2:40693] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP id DB/46-19568-DCFD9644 for ; Tue, 16 May 2006 10:21:02 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Fg0Jr-00014x-Un for internals@lists.php.net; Tue, 16 May 2006 16:14:40 +0200 Received: from 85.19.74.66 ([85.19.74.66]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 16 May 2006 16:14:39 +0200 Received: from sb by 85.19.74.66 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 16 May 2006 16:14:39 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: internals@lists.php.net Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 16:09:00 +0200 Lines: 10 Message-ID: References: <785810036.20060511193536@ionzoft.com> <7.0.1.0.2.20060515210559.06acd350@zend.com> <1217741491.20060515174322@ionzoft.com> <89.E7.19568.50199644@pb1.pair.com> <7.0.1.0.2.20060516133953.09045a30@zend.com> <63.CD.19568.525B9644@pb1.pair.com> <4858f9d90605160625u11fcaef8ta07fc199558eca9f@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 85.19.74.66 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060506) In-Reply-To: <4858f9d90605160625u11fcaef8ta07fc199558eca9f@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Sender: news Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] private, protected, readonly, public From: sb@sebastian-bergmann.de (Sebastian Bergmann) Stefan Walk wrote: > I'm against visible private variables. If they are visible, they are > part of the interface of the class, which means changing the > implementation means a BC break. This is a valid point against readonly, indeed. -- Sebastian Bergmann http://www.sebastian-bergmann.de/ GnuPG Key: 0xB85B5D69 / 27A7 2B14 09E4 98CD 6277 0E5B 6867 C514 B85B 5D69