Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:23441 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 10910 invoked by uid 1010); 16 May 2006 02:41:52 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 10893 invoked from network); 16 May 2006 02:41:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 16 May 2006 02:41:52 -0000 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: andi@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 80.74.107.235 mail.zend.com Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from ([80.74.107.235:11018] helo=mail.zend.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP id 40/DD-19568-FEB39644 for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 22:41:52 -0400 Received: (qmail 15588 invoked from network); 16 May 2006 02:41:38 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ANDI-NOTEBOOK.zend.com) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 16 May 2006 02:41:38 -0000 Message-ID: <7.0.1.0.2.20060515194051.02b32ef8@zend.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.1.0 Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 19:41:33 -0700 To: Edin Kadribasic ,truth@proposaltech.com Cc: Marcus Boerger ,internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: <4468DB43.1020005@emini.dk> References: <138663365.20060514205903@marcus-boerger.de> <038d01c676f8$ab9b3380$6602a8c0@foxbox> <44685D24.2000801@php.net> <1147708994.14148.23.camel@notebook.local> <16710545416.20060515202714@marcus-boerger.de> <1147721541.14148.47.camel@notebook.local> <4468DB43.1020005@emini.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] fatal static call in php 6.0? From: andi@zend.com (Andi Gutmans) I don't see why it has to be a fatal error. If there's an instanceof relationship we can keep $this. If not, we should not pass $this (which I believe we already do in PHP 5), in which case the author would have to pass $this if he wants to change public properties. Andi At 12:49 PM 5/15/2006, Edin Kadribasic wrote: >Todd Ruth wrote: >>I don't see benefits of making semi-static fatal that make it >>worth keeping those of us with large apps that depend on semi- >>static from upgrading to php6. > >My sentiments exactly. OO purity/strictness do now work well with >PHP's main strength -- its dynamicity. > >Edin > >-- >PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List >To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php