Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:23413 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 8121 invoked by uid 1010); 15 May 2006 19:48:52 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 8106 invoked from network); 15 May 2006 19:48:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 15 May 2006 19:48:52 -0000 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: edink@emini.dk X-Host-Fingerprint: 192.38.9.232 gw2.emini.dk Linux 2.4/2.6 Received: from ([192.38.9.232:15757] helo=gw2.emini.dk) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP id 97/CE-19568-32BD8644 for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 15:48:52 -0400 Received: from [10.0.0.11] (gw1.emini.dk [212.242.124.121]) by gw2.emini.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id D48D7B1AA9; Mon, 15 May 2006 21:48:47 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4468DB43.1020005@emini.dk> Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 21:49:23 +0200 Organization: Emini A/S User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: truth@proposaltech.com Cc: Marcus Boerger , internals@lists.php.net References: <138663365.20060514205903@marcus-boerger.de> <038d01c676f8$ab9b3380$6602a8c0@foxbox> <44685D24.2000801@php.net> <1147708994.14148.23.camel@notebook.local> <16710545416.20060515202714@marcus-boerger.de> <1147721541.14148.47.camel@notebook.local> In-Reply-To: <1147721541.14148.47.camel@notebook.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] fatal static call in php 6.0? From: edink@emini.dk (Edin Kadribasic) Todd Ruth wrote: > I don't see benefits of making semi-static fatal that make it > worth keeping those of us with large apps that depend on semi- > static from upgrading to php6. My sentiments exactly. OO purity/strictness do now work well with PHP's main strength -- its dynamicity. Edin