Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:23408
Return-Path: <helly@php.net>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 95949 invoked by uid 1010); 15 May 2006 19:19:29 -0000
Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net
Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 95934 invoked from network); 15 May 2006 19:19:29 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 15 May 2006 19:19:29 -0000
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: helly@php.net
X-Host-Fingerprint: 81.169.182.136 ajaxatwork.net Linux 2.4/2.6
Received: from ([81.169.182.136:55814] helo=strato.aixcept.de)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP
	id 74/0D-19568-144D8644 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Mon, 15 May 2006 15:19:29 -0400
Received: from baumbart.mbo (dslb-084-063-060-049.pools.arcor-ip.net [84.63.60.49])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by strato.aixcept.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 238F035C1E8;
	Mon, 15 May 2006 21:19:25 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 21:19:28 +0200
Reply-To: Marcus Boerger <helly@php.net>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: <1867980498.20060515211928@marcus-boerger.de>
To: Markus Fischer <markus@fischer.name>
Cc: Greg Beaver <cellog@php.net>, Steph Fox <steph@zend.com>,
	Pierre-Alain Joye <pajoye@php.net>, <internals@lists.php.net>
In-Reply-To: <4468D0B4.9010305@fischer.name>
References: <138663365.20060514205903@marcus-boerger.de> <038d01c676f8$ab9b3380$6602a8c0@foxbox> <44685D24.2000801@php.net> <1408277471.20060515204040@marcus-boerger.de> <4468D0B4.9010305@fischer.name>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] E_ALL changes in 5.2/6.0
From: helly@php.net (Marcus Boerger)

Hello Markus,

Monday, May 15, 2006, 9:04:20 PM, you wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1

> Marcus Burger wrote:
>> Ones again E_ALL is for development.

> Is this the statement of all developers or only yours?

Probably mine, I mean i can only speak for myself here.

> I have to enable E_ALL on live servers (display_errors to 0), because
> whatever resource you have at your hand, you just can't make sure that
> all code paths work properly with all the possible user inputs. It's
> just not possible.

This is very true, yet i don't see a reason to include E_NOTICE and E_STRICT
on a production machine.

Best regards,
 Marcus