Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:23397 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 75432 invoked by uid 1010); 15 May 2006 18:27:15 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 75416 invoked from network); 15 May 2006 18:27:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 15 May 2006 18:27:15 -0000 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: helly@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 81.169.182.136 ajaxatwork.net Linux 2.4/2.6 Received: from ([81.169.182.136:55624] helo=strato.aixcept.de) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP id EF/5A-19568-108C8644 for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 14:27:13 -0400 Received: from baumbart.mbo (dslb-084-063-060-049.pools.arcor-ip.net [84.63.60.49]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by strato.aixcept.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2344535C1E8; Mon, 15 May 2006 20:27:11 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 20:27:14 +0200 Reply-To: Marcus Boerger X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <16710545416.20060515202714@marcus-boerger.de> To: Todd Ruth Cc: internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: <1147708994.14148.23.camel@notebook.local> References: <138663365.20060514205903@marcus-boerger.de> <038d01c676f8$ab9b3380$6602a8c0@foxbox> <44685D24.2000801@php.net> <1147708994.14148.23.camel@notebook.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] fatal static call in php 6.0? From: helly@php.net (Marcus Boerger) Hello Todd, Monday, May 15, 2006, 6:03:14 PM, you wrote: > On Mon, 2006-05-15 at 06:51 -0400, Greg Beaver wrote: > ... >> Side note: calling functions statically that do not have a static >> modifier causes E_STRICT. Hello PEAR::isError() >> >> This is of course going to be a fatal in PHP 6, but it is now the most >> common E_STRICT I see in PHP4-based code. > Yikes! Please say it isn't so! There are significant portions of > our app that rely on php's ability to make "semi-static" calls. It > would never be worth the cost of upgrading to php6 if that were the > case. > It's not the best style, but we have scores of classes that > have several members in common and need common functionality > for those members. In php5 and earlier, you can add helper > classes and call helper functions with the "::" syntax. The > helper can access all of the members of the main class as if > it were its own. The "right" thing to do would be to step > back in the design and move the members to other classes, > etc., but as practical matter, sometimes that's just not > worth the effort to make such drastic changes to code that's > developed by accretion. > Another use is that we have core data that most classes keep > in an "$application" member variable. It's sort of like a > global, but to allow for a couple instances of a class to > work on different app data, we've taken the member route > instead of the global route. php is a nice language for this > in that we don't have to pass $application to every static > function we call. The static function has access to > $this->application, because everyone who calls the static > function has the application member. > Please don't fatal error this code in php 6! > Thanks for listening, > Todd Ever heared of the concept named root class?