Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:23353 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 6906 invoked by uid 1010); 15 May 2006 06:16:58 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 6891 invoked from network); 15 May 2006 06:16:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 15 May 2006 06:16:58 -0000 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: derick@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 82.94.239.5 jdi.jdi-ict.nl Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from ([82.94.239.5:40236] helo=jdi.jdi-ict.nl) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP id 67/67-19568-9DC18644 for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 02:16:57 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jdi.jdi-ict.nl (8.13.6/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k4F6GqCa016297; Mon, 15 May 2006 08:16:53 +0200 Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 08:16:40 +0200 (CEST) X-X-Sender: derick@localhost To: Marcus Boerger cc: internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: <138663365.20060514205903@marcus-boerger.de> Message-ID: References: <138663365.20060514205903@marcus-boerger.de> X-Face: "L'&?Ah3MYF@FB4hU'XhNhLB]222(Lbr2Y@F:GE[OO;"F5p>qtFBl|yVVA&D{A(g3[C}mG:199P+5C'v.M/u@Z\![0b:Mv.[l6[uWl' MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] E_ALL changes in 5.2/6.0 From: derick@php.net (Derick Rethans) On Sun, 14 May 2006, Marcus Boerger wrote: > That said i am about to not remove E_STRICT from E_ALL and MFH the php > 6.0 to item just now. > See: http://oss.backendmedia.com/PhP60 (add E_STRICT to E_ALL DONE (dmitry)) > > Since this is for the benefit of the users to prevent issues with > changes in behavior from my opinion it is best to do this behavior > change as early as possible, which is in my opinion 5.2 anyway. > > That said i'll let it in and if there is no valid argument against, i > will put it into the NEWS file and the newly started README.UPDATE_5_2. Yup, I agree on this. regards, Derick