Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:23251
Return-Path: <derick@php.net>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 77073 invoked by uid 1010); 11 May 2006 14:33:17 -0000
Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net
Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 77042 invoked from network); 11 May 2006 14:33:17 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 11 May 2006 14:33:17 -0000
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: derick@php.net
X-Host-Fingerprint: 82.94.239.5 jdi.jdi-ict.nl Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4)
Received: from ([82.94.239.5:47587] helo=jdi.jdi-ict.nl)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP
	id FD/22-19568-B2B43644 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Thu, 11 May 2006 10:33:16 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by jdi.jdi-ict.nl (8.13.6/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k4BEX7n6015570;
	Thu, 11 May 2006 16:33:07 +0200
Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 16:33:00 +0200 (CEST)
X-X-Sender: derick@localhost
To: Andi Gutmans <andi@zend.com>
cc: Edin Kadribasic <edink@emini.dk>,
	PHP Developers Mailing List <internals@lists.php.net>
In-Reply-To: <7.0.1.0.2.20060511072818.06e81f00@zend.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0605111632290.3685@localhost>
References: <444E0854.2000804@emini.dk> <200604251602.42837.bu@orbitel.bg>
	<444E2108.8050203@iamjochem.com> <749874265.20060426211537@marcus-boerger.de>
	<444FDF4C.4020303@emini.dk> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0605111417170.3685@localhost>
	<7.0.1.0.2.20060511072818.06e81f00@zend.com>
X-Face: "L'&?Ah3MYF@FB4hU'XhNhLB]222(Lbr2Y@F:GE[OO;"F5p>qtFBl|yVVA&D{A(g3[C}mG:199P+5C'v.M/u@Z\![0b:Mv.[l6[uWl'
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Static properties
From: derick@php.net (Derick Rethans)

On Thu, 11 May 2006, Andi Gutmans wrote:

> Yep I agree but unfortunately it seems that most people on the dev team either
> don't care or don't speak up.
> Also, I asked time and again to add BC breaking changes to an UPGRADING file.
> Had that been done we would have noticed and could have reacted.

Huh? This particular part was never changed as it was never 
implemented...

regards,
Derick