Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:23243 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 12723 invoked by uid 1010); 11 May 2006 12:18:12 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 12707 invoked from network); 11 May 2006 12:18:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 11 May 2006 12:18:11 -0000 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: derick@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 82.94.239.5 jdi.jdi-ict.nl Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from ([82.94.239.5:42395] helo=jdi.jdi-ict.nl) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP id 6C/69-19568-28B23644 for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 08:18:10 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jdi.jdi-ict.nl (8.13.6/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k4BCI322014284; Thu, 11 May 2006 14:18:04 +0200 Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 14:17:57 +0200 (CEST) X-X-Sender: derick@localhost To: Edin Kadribasic cc: PHP Developers Mailing List In-Reply-To: <444FDF4C.4020303@emini.dk> Message-ID: References: <444E0854.2000804@emini.dk> <200604251602.42837.bu@orbitel.bg> <444E2108.8050203@iamjochem.com> <749874265.20060426211537@marcus-boerger.de> <444FDF4C.4020303@emini.dk> X-Face: "L'&?Ah3MYF@FB4hU'XhNhLB]222(Lbr2Y@F:GE[OO;"F5p>qtFBl|yVVA&D{A(g3[C}mG:199P+5C'v.M/u@Z\![0b:Mv.[l6[uWl' MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Static properties From: derick@php.net (Derick Rethans) On Wed, 26 Apr 2006, Edin Kadribasic wrote: > Marcus Boerger wrote: > > It is just some decision that was taken that the newer OO stuff should be a > > bit more strict. > > I don't remember any such decision. I don't even remember a discussion about > it. I'm aware of the efforts of some people to make PHP less PHP and more Java > and thus we end up in a situation where: > > class foo{}; foo::$bar = 1; > > is a fatal error. This makes things that I really like about PHP impossible. > By now I'm used to being not constrained by a static language and having such > restrictions placed on new features makes no sense to me. Yup, I agree. OO is good, but it shouldn't limit application development just for the sake of things not being pure OO. Derick -- Derick Rethans http://derickrethans.nl | http://ez.no | http://xdebug.org