Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:22959 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 92071 invoked by uid 1010); 25 Apr 2006 14:59:00 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 92056 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2006 14:59:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 25 Apr 2006 14:59:00 -0000 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: kingwez@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 64.233.166.182 pproxy.gmail.com Linux 2.4/2.6 Received: from ([64.233.166.182:36417] helo=pproxy.gmail.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP id E0/C7-19715-3393E444 for ; Tue, 25 Apr 2006 10:58:59 -0400 Received: by pproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 57so1496670pya for ; Tue, 25 Apr 2006 07:58:55 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=jzCU43TI48sovMr1ekuleYqZfdLiSrtE3Phngd0TwAeM/0Us4GftiuvoOJvQTIYmpc0hRjv7sSYYaMKRfSbPMbZ2MpgWzSoF1iygII1/nV8FbCdTXQbZUafaue5TOlwBmgDNIItGqjuIrb5JCOuV7IsEm+HxrY5IVo+9MK0FzoQ= Received: by 10.35.18.4 with SMTP id v4mr47376pyi; Tue, 25 Apr 2006 07:58:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.41.17 with HTTP; Tue, 25 Apr 2006 07:58:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4e89b4260604250758h5588d1abk1fd4a72dfc1b29d4@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 10:58:55 -0400 To: "Steph Fox" Cc: "Antony Dovgal" , php-dev In-Reply-To: <003601c66839$a92ea9b0$6602a8c0@foxbox> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <444D475B.1060200@zend.com> <003601c66839$a92ea9b0$6602a8c0@foxbox> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] more candidates for PECL From: kingwez@gmail.com ("Wez Furlong") The problem with moving ext/skeleton is that we'll end up shipping PHP without an extension template of any kind. Almost every single PHP book that talks about writing extensions uses ext_skel to do so. Giving PECL_gen some good press is a different issue, and does not require that we move ext/skeleton or ext_skel. I can't see any negative points to keeping ext/skeleton in the tree. --Wez. On 4/25/06, Steph Fox wrote: > I'd add ext/skeleton to that list. Hartmut's PECL_gen project is way ahea= d > of it, actively supported and very easy to get hold of... and Hartmut giv= es > it a at every opportunity :) > > - Steph > > > > Hello all. > > > > I'd like to propose yet another bunch of extensions to be moved from co= re > > to PECL. > > (Don't worry, this is for 5.2 and HEAD. 5.1 is untouchable atm). > > > > They are: > > > > ext/hwapi > > --------- > > Bugs: 7 bug reports. All bogus. > > Status: unmaintained > > > > I've never heard of Hyperwave and I can hardly believe there is at leas= t > > one person on the planet who uses this module. > > No idea why do we include it in the core. > > > > ext/filepro > > ----------- > > Bugs: 1 bug report. Take a look at it, it's really useful: > > http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=3D12102 > > Status: unmaintained > > > > Looks like filePro is some kind of pseudo-DB based on files. At least t= his > > is what Wikipedia says. > > Is it really necessary to support it IN THE CORE along with SQLite? > > > > ext/recode > > ---------- > > Bugs: 10 bug reports. All of them were created in old good times of PHP > > 3.0b3. > > Status: maintained (though, I can see from the CVS log that it was chan= ged > > last time ~5 years ago, excluding "bump year" and other minor changes). > > And btw, it's known to break ext/mysql build. > > > > I've no idea why do we need yet another unsupported and not recommended > > way to do what ICONV does. > > > > --------------------------------------------- > > Ok, basically this is it. But not really... > > > > I would like to make one more proposal: Lets move ALL > > unsupported/unmaintained/unused extensions to Sibe^H^H^H^H PECL. > > > > Yes, I know that "people rely on them being in the core.. blah-blah-bla= h". > > That's great. And that'll help us to find maintainers for the code. > > Or at least will bring some attention to the problem of core extensions > > (aka "known to be stable"), which are not even maintained for years. I > > believe nobody actually uses them because of that - take a look at > > ext/snmp, for example. A bunch of poorly named (naming standards, eh?) > > _undocumented_ functions... Oh, and the implementation is also.. weird. > > > > Not sure if it's possible to move SAPIs to PECL, but having 9 (yes, NIN= E) > > unmaintained/unsupported SAPIs sounds like a bit overkill to me. > > (aolserver, apache_hooks, caudium, continuity, milter, phttpd, pi3web, > > roxen, tux - yup, nine..) > > > > -- > > Wbr, Antony Dovgal > > > > -- > > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > >