Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:22881 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 29344 invoked by uid 1010); 19 Apr 2006 20:49:18 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 29329 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2006 20:49:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 19 Apr 2006 20:49:18 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 69.56.217.178 b2.d9.3845.static.theplanet.com Linux 2.4/2.6 Received: from ([69.56.217.178:53973] helo=coggeshall.org) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP id 6C/70-19715-E42A6444 for ; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 16:49:18 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.234] (69-162-207-15.bflony.adelphia.net [69.162.207.15]) (authenticated bits=0) by coggeshall.org (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k3JKNJSe009492 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 19 Apr 2006 15:23:23 -0500 To: Steph Fox Cc: Edin Kadribasic , internals@lists.php.net, Michael Wallner In-Reply-To: <0bba01c663f6$0d8d0c50$6602a8c0@foxbox> References: <09f201c6639c$c8fe39f0$6602a8c0@foxbox> <0a0a01c663a0$755b4230$6602a8c0@foxbox> <008b01c6639d$f39177d0$0100a8c0@pc07653> <0a1f01c663a6$f49711e0$6602a8c0@foxbox> <00a201c6639f$bee582e0$0100a8c0@pc07653> <0a4301c663ac$9cc9bf70$6602a8c0@foxbox> <000701c663a5$35558ab0$0100a8c0@pc07653> <4446215F.7000803@emini.dk> <004a01c663bd$a0f3d160$0100a8c0@pc07653> <0aad01c663d9$d821baa0$6602a8c0@foxbox> <65.2B.19715.21376444@pb1.pair.com> <0b4601c663e8$303f86f0$6602a8c0@foxbox> <444697A4.1000607@emini.dk> <0bba01c663f6$0d8d0c50$6602a8c0@foxbox> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 16:44:35 -0400 Message-ID: <1145479476.21753.10.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.4 (2.0.4-6) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] tiny patch for Tidy From: john@coggeshall.org (John Coggeshall) Nuno: Do you know when the BC break was with libtidy? I'll need to add a config.m4 check at the very least. John On Wed, 2006-04-19 at 23:13 +0200, Steph Fox wrote: > > I just thought that since we're looking at tidy we might as well update > > the libs on win32 build boxes :) > > Mm but actually what's more likely to happen, now that it's turned into a > discussion on upgrading, is precisely nothing. AKA the static build won't be > fixed because 'there's going to be an upgrade soon so there's no point' and > the new functions won't be wrapped because John will need to make time to > look into them, and has none. > > :( >