Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:22877
Return-Path: <edink@emini.dk>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 98910 invoked by uid 1010); 19 Apr 2006 20:03:40 -0000
Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net
Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 98874 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2006 20:03:39 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 19 Apr 2006 20:03:39 -0000
X-Host-Fingerprint: 192.38.9.232 gw2.emini.dk Linux 2.4/2.6
Received: from ([192.38.9.232:14670] helo=gw2.emini.dk)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP
	id 1F/EB-19715-A9796444 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 16:03:38 -0400
Received: from [10.0.0.11] (gw1.emini.dk [212.242.124.121])
	by gw2.emini.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id A63A5A98D0; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 22:03:32 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <444697A4.1000607@emini.dk>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 22:03:48 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Steph Fox <steph@zend.com>
Cc: internals@lists.php.net, Michael Wallner <mike@php.net>
References: <09f201c6639c$c8fe39f0$6602a8c0@foxbox> <0a0a01c663a0$755b4230$6602a8c0@foxbox> <008b01c6639d$f39177d0$0100a8c0@pc07653> <0a1f01c663a6$f49711e0$6602a8c0@foxbox> <00a201c6639f$bee582e0$0100a8c0@pc07653> <0a4301c663ac$9cc9bf70$6602a8c0@foxbox> <000701c663a5$35558ab0$0100a8c0@pc07653> <4446215F.7000803@emini.dk> <004a01c663bd$a0f3d160$0100a8c0@pc07653> <0aad01c663d9$d821baa0$6602a8c0@foxbox> <65.2B.19715.21376444@pb1.pair.com> <0b4601c663e8$303f86f0$6602a8c0@foxbox>
In-Reply-To: <0b4601c663e8$303f86f0$6602a8c0@foxbox>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] tiny patch for Tidy
From: edink@emini.dk (Edin Kadribasic)

Steph Fox wrote:
> <shrug />
> 
> It seems very odd to me there can't just be a one-line fix for something 
> that's broken in 5_1 win32 static build without a whole hoo-ha going down.
> 
> The extension doesn't build against the new library without fiddling, 
> and nor does it build against the library we actually use. The 
> difference is that if the new library is used in the distro builds it 
> _may_ affect the PHP 4.* version (did anyone test to prove it won't, 
> yet?), and _will_ (definitively) affect anyone attempting to build the 
> extension against an older copy of the library, thanks to a minor API 
> change in Tidy.
> 
> On the other hand, if the extension is fixed in PHP 5.1 and up to build 
> with the existing library, it will _only_ affect win32 users attempting 
> to build the extension statically against a newer edition of the library 
> - which they can't currently do anyway.
> 
> So what's the issue?

I just thought that since we're looking at tidy we might as well update 
the libs on win32 build boxes :)

Edin