Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:22852 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 64958 invoked by uid 1010); 19 Apr 2006 10:47:03 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 64943 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2006 10:47:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 19 Apr 2006 10:47:03 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 192.38.9.232 gw2.emini.dk Linux 2.4/2.6 Received: from ([192.38.9.232:16040] helo=gw2.emini.dk) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP id ED/3E-19715-62516444 for ; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 06:47:03 -0400 Received: by gw2.emini.dk (Postfix, from userid 504) id 551E7AD47F; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:47:00 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on gw2.emini.dk X-Spam-Detected: no X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Level: Received: from foxbox (unknown [84.228.8.209]) by gw2.emini.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E650AD44C; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:46:58 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <0a1f01c663a6$f49711e0$6602a8c0@foxbox> Reply-To: "Steph Fox" To: "Nuno Lopes" , "internals" Cc: "Edin" References: <09f201c6639c$c8fe39f0$6602a8c0@foxbox> <0a0a01c663a0$755b4230$6602a8c0@foxbox> <008b01c6639d$f39177d0$0100a8c0@pc07653> Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:46:52 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="Windows-1252"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] tiny patch for Tidy From: steph@zend.com ("Steph Fox") I updated my copy from Edin's collection last week. It's newer than last year's, but I'm struggling to find any form of 'version' in there to know exactly what I have in front of me. So what are you talking about? Update from what, to what, and for which PHP build? > BTW, the libtidy could be updated :) It had a major optimization a few > time ago (it decreased my bechmark running time by ~30%). > > Nuno > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Steph Fox" > To: "internals" > Cc: "Edin" > Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2006 12:00 PM > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] tiny patch for Tidy > > >> Oops, forget it. The problem with having both PECL and src on board is I >> assumed I was building against the one with this change in it. I wasn't - >> I was building against the one that didn't have tidyOptGetDoc in the >> export list AT ALL. >> >> Just ran a test and found this is illegal syntax :( so back to the >> drawing board. >> >> (Edin: is there some way you know of to do an #ifdef equivalent in these >> export lists?) >> >> - Steph >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Steph Fox" >> To: "internals" >> Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2006 12:34 PM >> Subject: [PHP-DEV] tiny patch for Tidy >> >> >>> This allows static builds under win32 despite the fact that >>> tidyOptGetDoc() >>> doesn't exist in the libtidy.lib we're linking against. >>> >>> It needs applying to php_tidy.def everywhere libtidy v 2 is used - that >>> is, >>> ext/tidy in CVS HEAD and PHP_5_1, and CVS HEAD pecl/tidy. >>> >>> In all three cases there is the same #ifdef clause for the matching >>> tidy_get_opt_doc() function in the header file. >>> >>> - Steph > > > __________ NOD32 1.1380 (20060125) Information __________ > > This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. > http://www.eset.com > >