Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:22668 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 82651 invoked by uid 1010); 4 Apr 2006 23:03:53 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 82636 invoked from network); 4 Apr 2006 23:03:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 4 Apr 2006 23:03:53 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 80.74.107.235 mail.zend.com Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from ([80.74.107.235:14545] helo=mail.zend.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP id B3/41-19347-85BF2344 for ; Tue, 04 Apr 2006 19:03:53 -0400 Received: (qmail 4092 invoked from network); 4 Apr 2006 23:03:48 -0000 Received: from internal.zend.office (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (10.1.1.1) by internal.zend.office with SMTP; 4 Apr 2006 23:03:48 -0000 Message-ID: <4432FB54.5060406@zend.com> Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2006 03:03:48 +0400 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nuno Lopes CC: PHPdev References: <001301c65830$6a14cb60$0100a8c0@pc07653> <4432F8D4.7020603@zend.com> <005d01c6583b$140403c0$0100a8c0@pc07653> In-Reply-To: <005d01c6583b$140403c0$0100a8c0@pc07653> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Coverity report From: antony@zend.com (Antony Dovgal) On 05.04.2006 02:56, Nuno Lopes wrote: >> On 05.04.2006 01:40, Nuno Lopes wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Has anyone already received the Coverity report >>> (http://scan.coverity.com)? >> >> Lot of people did. >> Including me =) > > and did anyone found a bug by reading Coverity's report? I didn't noticed > unusual commits... I did fix a couple of potential problems like dereferencing a pointer and then checking it for NULL. Not sure if they could lead to real bugs, though they looked valid to me. >>> I would like to take a look at it and help to fix the 42 detected bugs. >> >> s/bugs/pieces of code that Coverity doesn't like/ > > yes, of course. I bet most are just false positives. That's why there are now only 42 defects comparing to initial 204 =) -- Wbr, Antony Dovgal